Depopulation by ‘vaccination’…

Updates here: Non-exhaustive numbers from the VAERS database

31 Reasons Why I Won’t Take the ‘Vaccine

From Lew Rockwell: 31 Reasons Why I Won’t Take the Vaccine

The following list was created by the Israeli rabbi Chananya Weissman. Many thanks to MC for the tip.

1.  It’s not a vaccine. A vaccine by definition provides immunity to a disease. This does not provide immunity to anything. In a best-case scenario, it merely reduces the chance of getting a severe case of a virus if one catches it. Hence, it is a medical treatment, not a vaccine. I do not want to take a medical treatment for an illness I do not have.

2.  The drug companies, politicians, medical establishment, and media have joined forces to universally refer to this as a vaccine when it is not one, with the intention of manipulating people into feeling safer about undergoing a medical treatment. Because they are being deceitful, I do not trust them, and want nothing to do with their medical treatment.

3.  The presumed benefits of this medical treatment are minimal and would not last long in any case. The establishment acknowledges this, and is already talking about additional shots and ever-increasing numbers of new “vaccines” that would be required on a regular basis. I refuse to turn myself into a chronic patient who receives injections of new pharmaceutical products on a regular basis simply to reduce my chances of getting a severe case of a virus that these injections do not even prevent.

4.  I can reduce my chances of getting a severe case of a virus by strengthening my immune system naturally. In the event I catch a virus, there are vitamins and well-established drugs that have had wonderful results in warding off the illness, without the risks and unknowns of this medical treatment.

5.  The establishment insists that this medical treatment is safe. They cannot possibly know this because the long-term effects are entirely unknown, and will not be known for many years. They may speculate that it is safe, but it is disingenuous for them to make such a claim that cannot possibly be known. Because they are being disingenuous, I do not trust them, and I want no part of their treatment.

6.  The drug companies have zero liability if anything goes wrong, and cannot be sued. Same for the politicians who are pushing this treatment. I will not inject myself with a new, experimental medical device when the people behind it accept no liability or responsibility if something goes wrong. I will not risk my health and my life when they refuse to risk anything.

7.  Israel’s Prime Minister has openly admitted that the Israeli people are the world’s laboratory for this experimental treatment. I am not interested in being a guinea pig or donating my body to science.

8.  Israel agreed to share medical data of its citizens with a foreign drug company as a fundamental part of their agreement to receive this treatment. I never consented for my personal medical data to be shared with any such entity, nor was I even asked. I will not contribute to this sleazy enterprise.

9.  The executives and board members at Pfizer are on record that they have not taken their own treatment, despite all the fanfare and assurances. They are claiming that they would consider it unfair to “cut the line”. This is a preposterous excuse, and it takes an unbelievable amount of chutzpah to even say such a thing. Such a “line” is a figment of their own imagination; if they hogged a couple of injections for themselves no one would cry foul. In addition, billionaires with private jets and private islands are not known for waiting in line until hundreds of millions of peasants all over the world go first to receive anything these billionaires want for themselves.

The establishment media have accepted this preposterous excuse without question or concern. Moreover, they laud Pfizer’s executives for their supposed self-sacrifice in not taking their own experimental treatment until we go first. Since they consider us such fools, I do not trust them, and do not want their new treatment. They can have my place in line. I’ll go to the very back of the line.

Three facts that must be put together:

Bill Gates is touting these vaccines as essential to the survival of the human race.
Bill Gates believes the world has too many people and needs to be “depopulated”.
Bill Gates, perhaps the richest man in the world, has also not been injected. No rush.

Uh, no. I’ll pass on any medical treatments he wants me to take.

12.  The establishment has been entirely one-sided in celebrating this treatment. The politicians and media are urging people to take it as both a moral and civic duty. The benefits of the treatment are being greatly exaggerated, the risks are being ignored, and the unknowns are being brushed aside. Because they are being deceitful and manipulative, I will not gamble my personal wellbeing on their integrity.

13.  There is an intense propaganda campaign for people to take this treatment. Politicians and celebrities are taking selfies of themselves getting injected (perhaps in some cases pretending to get injected), the media is hyping this as the coolest, smartest, most happy and fun thing to do. It is the most widespread marketing campaign in history. This is not at all appropriate for any medical treatment, let alone a brand new one, and it makes me recoil.

14.The masses are following in tow, posting pictures of themselves getting injected with a drug, feeding the mass peer pressure to do the same. There is something very alarming and sick about this, and I want no part of it. I never took drugs just because “everyone’s doing it” and it’s cool. I’m certainly not going to start now.

15.  Those who raise concerns about this medical treatment are being bullied, slandered, mocked, censored, ostracized, threatened, and fired from their jobs. This includes medical professionals who have science-based concerns about the drug and caregivers who have witnessed people under their charge suffering horrible reactions and death shortly after being injected. When the establishment is purging good people who risk everything simply to raise concerns about a new medical treatment — even if they don’t outright oppose it — I will trust these brave people over the establishment every time. I cannot think of a single similar case in history when truth and morality turned out to be on the side of the establishment.

16.  This is the greatest medical experiment in the history of the human race.

17.  It is purposely not being portrayed as the greatest medical experiment in the history of the human race, and the fact that it is a medical experiment at all is being severely downplayed.

18.  Were they up front with the masses, very few would agree to participate in such an experiment. Manipulating the masses to participate in a medical experiment under false pretenses violates the foundations of medical ethics and democratic law. I will not allow unethical people who engage in such conduct to inject me with anything.

19.  The medical establishment is not informing people about any of this. They have become marketing agents for an experimental drug, serving huge companies and politicians who have made deals with them. This is a direct conflict with their mandate to concern themselves exclusively with the wellbeing of the people under their care. Since the medical establishment has become corrupted, and has become nothing more than a corporate and political tool, I do not trust the experimental drug they want so badly to inject me with.

20.  We are being pressured in various ways to get injected, which violates medical ethics and the foundations of democratic society. The best way to get me not to do something is to pressure me to do it.

21.  The government has sealed their protocol related to the virus and treatments for THIRTY YEARS. This is information that the public has a right to know, and the government has a responsibility to share. What are they covering up? Do they really expect me to believe that everything is kosher about all this, and that they are concerned first and foremost with my health? The last time they did this was with the Yemenite Children Affair. If you’re not familiar with it, look it up. Now they’re pulling the same shtick. They didn’t fool me the first time, and they’re definitely not fooling me now.

The government can share our personal medical data with foreign corporations, but they won’t share their own protocol on the matter with us? I’m out.

23.  The establishment has recruited doctors, rabbis, the media, and the masses to harangue people who don’t want to get injected with a new drug. We are being called the worst sort of names. We are being told that we believe in crazy conspiracies, that we are against science, that we are selfish, that we are murderers, that we don’t care about the elderly, that it’s our fault that the government continues to impose draconian restrictions on the public. It’s all because we don’t want to get injected with an experimental treatment, no questions asked. We are even being told that we have a religious obligation to do this, and that we are grave sinners if we do not. They say that if we do not agree to get injected, we should be forced to stay inside our homes forever and be ostracized from public life.

This is horrific, disgusting, a perversion of common sense, morality, and the Torah. It makes me recoil, and only further cements my distrust of these people and my opposition to taking their experimental drug. How dare they?

24.  I know of many people who got injected, but none of them studied the science in depth, carefully weighed the potential benefits against the risks, compared this option to other alternatives, was truly informed, and decided this medical treatment was the best option for them. On the contrary, they got injected because of the hype, the propaganda, the pressure, the fear, blind trust in what “the majority of experts” supposedly believed (assuming THEY all studied everything in depth and were completely objective, which is highly dubious), blind trust in what certain influential rabbis urged them to do (ditto the above), or hysterical fear that the only option was getting injected or getting seriously ill from the virus. When I see mass hysteria and cult-like behavior surrounding a medical treatment, I will be extremely suspicious and avoid it.

25.  The drug companies have a long and glorious history of causing mass carnage with wonder drugs they thrust on unsuspecting populations, even after serious problems had already become known. Instead of pressing the pause button and halting the marketing of these drugs until these issues could be properly investigated, the drug companies did everything in their power to suppress the information and keep pushing their products. When companies and people have demonstrated such gross lack of concern for human life, I will not trust them when they hype a new wonder drug. This isn’t our first rodeo.

26.  Indeed, the horror stories are already coming in at warp speed, but the politicians are not the least bit concerned, the medical establishment is brushing them aside as unrelated or negligible, the media is ignoring it, the drug companies are steaming ahead at full speed, and those who raise a red flag continue to be bullied, censored, and punished. Clearly my life and my wellbeing are not their primary concern. I will not be their next guinea pig in their laboratory. I will not risk being the next “coincidence”.

27.  Although many people have died shortly after getting injected — including perfectly healthy young people — we are not allowed to imply that the injection had anything to do with it. Somehow this is anti-science and will cause more people to die. I believe that denying any possible link, abusing people who speculate that there might be a link, and demonstrating not the slightest curiosity to even explore if there might be a link is what is anti-science and could very well cause more people to die. These same people believe I am obligated to get injected as well. No freaking thanks.

28.  I am repulsed by the religious, cult-like worship of a pharmaceutical product, and will not participate in this ritual.

My “healthcare” provider keeps badgering me to get injected, yet they have provided me no information on this treatment or any possible alternatives. Everything I know I learned from others outside the establishment. Informed consent has become conformed consent. I decline.

30.  I see all the lies, corruption, propaganda, manipulation, censorship, bullying, violation of medical ethics, lack of integrity in the scientific process, suppression of inconvenient adverse reactions, dismissal of legitimate concerns, hysteria, cult-like behavior, ignorance, closed-mindedness, fear, medical and political tyranny, concealment of protocols, lack of true concern for human life, lack of respect for basic human rights and freedoms, perversion of the Torah and common sense, demonization of good people, the greatest medical experiment of all time being conducted by greedy, untrustworthy, godless people, the lack of liability for those who demand I risk everything… I see all this and I have decided they can all have my place in line. I will put my trust in God. I will use the mind He blessed me with and trust my natural instincts. Which leads to the final reason which sums up why I will not get “vaccinated.”

31.  The whole thing stinks.

929 Deaths and 15,923 ‘adverse events’ caused by the experimental mRNA injections as of 12 Feb. 2021

501 Deaths + 10,748 Other Injuries Reported Following COVID Vaccine, Latest CDC Data Show

As the author reminds us, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System – VAERS only reports about 1% of the adverse events:

Historically, fewer than fewer than 1% of adverse events have ever been reported to VAERS, a system that Children’s Health Defense has previously referred to as an “abject failure,” including in a December 2020 letter to Dr. David Kessler, former FDA director and now co-chair of the COVID-19 Advisory Board and President Biden’s version of Operation Warp Speed.

A critic familiar with VAERS’ shortcomings bluntly condemned VAERS in The BMJ as “nothing more than window dressing, and a part of U.S. authorities’ systematic effort to reassure/deceive us about vaccine safety.”

In the UK (or what’s left of it since the takeover):

Massive wave of Care Home Deaths in UK after Vaxx

The BigSecret is out: There will be Annual Covid Vaccines FOREVER!

This is what happens when you give a year of your liberty to devils. They want you in their Hell forever!

This is also what happens to those who submit to every demands from bullies, prefer to cower at home, wear muzzles and obey blindly instead of fighting for their rights and dignity.

Slavery, misery and humiliation will be their daily bread!

How Covid Vaccines are paralyzing their victims

More on adverse reactions to the COVID-19 shots

Covid Vaccine Chorea
Autoimmune attack on cells of the basal ganglia, triggering a catastrophic movement disorder.


Compilation of recent stories and videos covering covid vaccine injuries, side effects and DEATHS

(Natural News) Part of the reason Big Tech censors anyone who discusses the truth about vaccine injuries is because they don’t want you to find out how dangerous covid vaccines really are.

Across the USA and around the world, people are dying from covid-19 vaccines. Many others are experiencing horrific convulsions, partial paralysis, hospitalizations and other bizarre side effects. (See the shocking videos below, all of which are banned on youtube and facebook.)

The following is a collection of some recent stories revealing the dangers of covid-19 vaccines. H/t to The Burning Platform for the list.

Health Experts Call For Suspension Of Pfizer Vaccination Among Elderly After Norway Deaths

Government Consigned Israeli Population to be Human Subjects in a Massive Experiment

“Israel bought large stocks of the [Covid-19] jab in exchange for acting as the world’s guinea pig.”

Of all people, they should know better, at least the population, not their criminal government, should know better. History repeats itself, 76 years after the end of the Holocaust, and they’ve learned nothing?

Health Experts Call For Suspension Of Pfizer Vaccination Among Elderly After Norway Deaths

Nurses in Ireland after poison vaccine

Kristi Simmonds horrific adverse event

How COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ May Destroy the Lives of Millions

The Inanity of RNA Vaccines For COVID-19

The present article is a follow-up of Compelling Evidence That SARS-CoV-2 Was Man-Made published in June 2020, which I encourage people to read first. In it, I concluded as follows:

It’s probable that by the end of 2020, like every year, a flu epidemic will emerge. This virus will, conveniently, be deemed a close relative to SARS-CoV-2, maybe with ‘extra terrifying features’.

But there will be no need to despair because, by this time, the authorities will have prepared a vaccine. That’s one of the reasons why hydroxycholoroquine was lambasted and banned. If a safe and effective treatment already exists, who is going to accept a rushed and unknown vaccine? A vaccine that will allegedly protect people against COVID-20, but will in reality be designed to ‘cancel’ the beneficial changes induced by the mutated strain of SARS-CoV-2. […]

    It’s probable that the vaccination won’t be mandatory. Remember that the authorities are now “kinder and gentler”. Instead of brute force, the authorities are more likely to use moral blackmail – “Get vaccinated to protect others!” – combined with social blackmail – “No vaccine = no job, no shopping, no travel, no socializing!” Basically, you’re free to choose between the vaccine passport or a life sentence in an isolated cell.

Here we are 7 months later. As suspected, new variants have appeared, manufactured COVID-19 deaths are ‘piling up‘, the vaccine passport has already been adopted by several countries and vaccination campaigns have been launched around the world.

In theory, medicines, vaccines included, are approved and used because their benefits far exceed their risks. In this sense, the ideal medicine would display zero risks and total effectiveness against an uncured and deadly disease. We’ll see in the present article that the COVID-19 vaccines, particularly the Pfizer vaccine, is pretty much the opposite of the ideal drug. It is dangerous, ineffective and targets a benign disease that already has known effective and safe treatments.

Where’s The Pandemic?

Case Fatality Rate

According to the WHO, in October 2020 an estimated 750 million people – about 10% of the world’s population – had been infected by SARS-CoV-2, and one million people had died of COVID-19. Those figures lead to a case fatality rate (CFR) of 0.13%, which is the typical CFR exhibited by the seasonal flu. When treated properly, like in Marseilles – where a hydroxychloroquine-based protocol and early clinical diagnosis is used – the CFR drops as low as 0.05%.

In Singapore, where the use of hydroxychloroquine is widespread and no national lockdown was ever imposed, the CFR of COVID-19 is the same as Marseilles, a mere 0.05% (29 deaths out of 59,000 cases).

What kind of ‘pandemic’ exhibits a case fatality rate equal to, or lower than, seasonal flu?

Real COVID deaths

The numbers above are based on the official data published by the WHO. Those numbers, particularly the total COVID deaths, are grossly inflated due to various deceptions:

1/ Comorbidity:

94% of the people who died of COVID-19 had comorbidity factors. A majority of them had not one but several comorbidity factors – in particular hypertension, obesity, chronic lung disease, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. For example a UK patient who had advanced cancer, kidney failure and diabetes, and had tested positive within 60 days prior to his death, will have his demise automatically attributed to COVID-19. In the UK, at the very least 30% of deaths attributed to COVID-19 are actually due to a comorbidity.

2/ False positives:

A lot of deaths were attributed to COVID-19 solely on the basis of a positive PCR test. In the words of its inventor Kary Mullis, chemistry Nobel Prize winner in 1993:

    …[PCR tests] cannot detect free infectious viruses at all […] The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.

The obvious question, therefore, is: how many other entities display sequences similar to SARS-CoV-2. PCR tests for SARS-COV-2 are based on 4 genes: RNA-polymerase (Rd-Rp),S gene (Orf2), E gene (Orf1ab) and N gene (Orf9a). The two first genes are found in dozens of human chromosomes and the two last ones are found in almost 100 different microbes. When these microbes and chromosomes sequences are detected, they are wrongly attributed to SARS-CoV-2.

The above is one reason for false positive test results, the other one relates to the number of PCR amplification cycles. According to the US CDC, it is virtually impossible to detect any live virus above a threshold of 33 cycles. However, many governments conduct 40, 45 even 50 amplification cycles. For illustration, a positive test at 40 cycles has about a 43% chance of no longer being positive, with a cutoff of 35, and 85% chance with a cutoff of 30.

The antigen test is even worse than the PCR test, leading to 63% more false positives! These tests are so unreliable that even the WHO discourages their use.

3/ Ban of effective treatments:

In Marseilles, France, where early diagnosis and proper treatment – including hydroxychloroquine combined with azythromycin – are administered, the crude mortality rate is 0.01%. 400 miles from there, in Paris, where there’s late diagnosis and the ban on those two drugs is enforced, the overall mortality rate jumps up to 0.075%. That’s a 7.5 fold increase.

Similar to Marseilles, Belarus and Iceland administered proper care and/or conducted early diagnosis, and they are among the countries with the lowest number of COVID-19 deaths, with 1,560 (0.016% crude mortality rate) and 29 (0.008% crude mortality rate), respectively, as of mid-January 2021. In the same vein, in Vietnam, which uses hydroxychloroquine, early diagnosis and implemented no national lockdown, crude mortality due to COVID-19 is 0.000036% (35 deaths among 96 million inhabitants).

4/ Transfer of flu casualties:

The southern hemisphere appears to have simply skipped the winter 2020 flu season, where flu deaths showed a 90% drop compared to previous years. According to mainstream media, this drop in flu deaths is due to the lockdown. If this is the case, however, how do we explain that France recorded a surprisingly low number of flu deaths during the flu season 2019-2020 that ended before the lockdown was imposed on March 17th. Indeed, only 3,680 flu deaths were recorded during the winter of 2019-2020. That’s a 70% drop in flu deaths compared to the last 10-year average mortality.

Another narrative explaining this sharp and unexpected drop in flu casualties is that the coronavirus prevented the activity of other viruses. But viruses have no difficulties in cohabiting. For example, in Europe alone during the 2019-2020 flu season, there were at least six active flu strains: type A A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2)) A(Unknown), B/Victoria, B/Yamagata and B/Unknown – and we know that SARS-CoV-2 was on the continent since at least December 2nd 2019.

In the northern hemisphere, France was not the only country to experience the disappearance of its annual seasonal flu. The USA and the UK respectively reported a staggering 98% and 90% decrease in deaths attributed to the seasonal flu.

Starting with the hyper-inflated WHO number of COVID deaths, which is 1.7 million as of January 2021, we can deduce the following numbers:

False positive deaths, patients who didn’t even have COVID, represent – at the very least – 33% of the total number of deaths attributed to COVID-19. That’s 700,000 out of 1.7 million.

Deaths due to comorbidities represent 30% of the total number of deaths attributed to COVID. That’s 500,000 out of 1.7 million.

About 90% of the typical flu death toll was transferred to the COVID tally. That’s 300,000 deaths out of 1.7 million.

Depending on the overlaps between those three kinds of non-COVID deaths, the real number of COVID-19 deaths can be estimated at between 300,000 and 1.1 million.

That range doesn’t even take into account the 7-fold reduction in mortality related to proper early diagnosis and adequate treatment.

Factoring this parameter in, the total mortality due to COVID-19 with early diagnosis and proper care would drop to somewhere between 40,000 and 140,000 casualties worldwide. Notice that the estimates above are very conservative. We are therefore left to wonder whether SARS-CoV-2 actually directly caused a significant number of deaths at all.

What kind of pandemic induces much less total deaths than the seasonal flu?

Excess mortality

The excess mortality includes deaths attributed to COVID-19 along with the numerous deaths due to the lockdowns. As we will see, it is likely that lockdowns induced many more deaths than COVID-19.

1/ Delayed treatments and diagnosis

Only a third of the excess deaths seen in the care homes and private residences in England and Wales can be explained by covid-19, the remaining two thirds are due to elderly citizens who were denied primary care and “who may well have lived longer if they had managed to get to hospital”. This problem is particularly true for cancer patients. In the UK, the denial of cancer diagnosis and medical treatment may lead to 18,000 more cancer patient deaths.

2/ Psychiatric conditions

A meta analysis of the mental health of the general population was published in December 2020. As expected, the “pandemic” significantly exacerbated this situation:

        Relatively high rates of symptoms of anxiety (6.33% to 50.9%), depression (14.6% to 48.3%), post-traumatic stress disorder (7% to 53.8%), psychological distress (34.43% to 38%), and stress (8.1% to 81.9%) are reported in the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic in China, Spain, Italy, Iran, the US, Turkey, Nepal, and Denmark […] The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with highly significant levels of psychological distress that, in many cases, would meet the threshold for clinical relevance.

It should be noted that the life expectancy of individuals suffering from mental illness is about 8 years shorter than the general population.

3/ Suicide

the definitive numbers about deaths in 2020 have not been compiled yet. However, the trend is already clear. According to some studies, suicide increased by 145%. Logically, suicidal tendencies surged alongside actual suicides with, for example, India experiencing a 67.7% increase in reports of suicidal behavior during lockdown. Similarly, in China, the appearance of very frequent suicidal thoughts has been noted while in Canada a 500% increase in suicide is projected.

4/ Alcoholism and drug addictions

Alcohol abuse sharply increased during the “pandemic”. In the UK, there was a 500% rise in calls to the British Liver Trust helpline since lockdown began in March. Similarly, Alcohol Change recorded a 242% rise in visits to their advice and support pages on their website during lockdown. Surveys on alcohol consumption tell a similar tale, with 21% of individuals stating they were drinking more often during lockdown. The heavy drinkers were the most affected, 38% of those who typically drank heavily during pre-lockdown said they drank even more during lockdown. In the US, a 54% increase in national sales of alcohol was recorded for the week ending March 21, 2020, compared with the previous year.

Similarly, drug overdoses rose strongly in 2020. For example, in the US, overdoses killed a staggering 81,000 people, a 38% increase in fatal overdoses compared to 2019.

5/ Poverty

According to the Worldbank, the “pandemic” could throw about 100 million additional people into extreme poverty. The difference in life expectancy between an individual in extreme poverty and a wealthy individual is at least 20 years. Notice that most of the deaths induced by the surge in extreme poverty will not happen immediately but in the years, if not decades, following this manufactured global economic crisis.

Despite the number of deaths due to lockdowns and their consequences rather than COVID-19, many countries didn’t even see a rise in excess mortality during the so-called pandemic. That is the case in Germany where hydroxychloroquine was used and a lot of early diagnosis was done.

Better than that, Iceland – which implemented one of the most effective early diagnosis approaches in the world – shows a mortality rate in 2020 that is lower than its average yearly mortality.

But the cherry on the cake is China, where about 55 tons of hydroxychloroquine were consumed in 2020 and where no national lockdown was implemented: as a result, China experienced virtually zero COVID deaths since April 2020.

Even France, which banned hydroxychloroquine and azythromycin and implemented extended lockdowns and curfews, experienced a mortality rate during Spring 2020 that was lower than during the 2017 flu season and since May 1st, 2020, no increase in mortality has been noticed.

What kind of pandemic doesn’t cause a marked excess in mortality?

Life Expectancy

In France, even before they tested positive for the virus, 80% of alleged COVID-19 victims had a life expectancy lower than one year due to comorbidities and advanced age. Overall, COVID-19 victims had a life expectancy of a mere 3 years and 82% of the victims were more than 70 years old. The average age for a COVID-19 death is 82, that is a few months shorter than the overall life expectancy.

In several countries, the average age of deaths attributed to COVID-19 is even higher than life expectancy. For example, in the UK, the average age for COVID-19 death is 82,6 years old while the average life expectancy is 81.2 years. In Sweden, the average age of those who have allegedly died of COVID-19 is 84 years old, two years more than the average age of death which is 82.

As a result of the very advanced age of the people who allegedly died of COVID-19, many countries didn’t experience any drop in life expectancy. This is the case in China that recorded 4,600 deaths attributed to COVID-19 out of a population of 1.4 billion, or Iceland and its 19 COVID victims out of 400,000 Icelandic citizens.

Even in France, where a lot of elderly citizens were left to die in nursing homes, where drastic lockdowns were implemented, where diagnosis and care was delayed for serious conditions and effective medicines against COVID-19 were banned and toxic drugs like Rivotril or Remdesivir were administered instead, life expectancy only decreased by 5 months.

What kind of pandemic doesn’t notably decrease life expectancy?

In summary, the typical victim of COVID-19 is an individual in his 80’s who lives in a nursing home and has several comorbidities.

Typically, such a person died because of the despair of social isolation and the delayed diagnosis and treatment of his serious comorbidities. In many cases, the patient didn’t even have COVID-19. However COVID-19 killed him, not directly, but through the isolation and denial of care induced by the well-orchestrated pandemic hysteria.

To recap, we are experiencing a rather peculiar “pandemic” that exhibits a case fatality ratio lower than the seasonal flu, kills less than the usual infectious diseases, didn’t trigger marked excess mortality and didn’t really lower life expectancy.

Vaccine Useless at Best, Detrimental at Worst?

The history of vaccines is replete with major scandals. Here are a few examples:

1/ the Salk polio vaccine which caused the worst polio outbreak in history, infecting 200,000 people with live polio, of whom 70,000 became sick

2/ the current prevalence of poliomyelitis caused by vaccines compared to naturally-occurring poliomyelitis

3/ the Dengue vaccine triggering the production of antibodies that are not detrimental but beneficial to the Dengue virus, leading to more severe forms of Dengue fever.

4/ And let’s not forget Bergamo, Italy where the population experienced a high prevalence of severe forms of COVID-19 among vaccinated people. There’s no mystery there, because for years, the flu vaccine has been known to favor and worsen coronavirus infections.

Likewise, vaccines against close relatives of SARS-COV-2 like SARS or MERS, that target the spike protein like the Pfizer ‘vaccine’, have also been tested but quickly canceled, one major adverse effect was the creation of antibodies that didn’t prevent but favored viral infections.

The vaccines against Dengue fever, influenza, SARS and MERS share the same fundamental flaw, which is well known by scientists as antibody-dependent enhancement, where the vaccine, instead of providing immunity, increase vulnerability and the severity of the disease it targets. In this context, it would not be surprising that the RNA vaccines trigger more severe forms of COVID-19.

In addition, like most retroviruses, SARS-CoV-2 is very prone to mutations. The analysis of 10,000 of its genomes revealed a high number of genetic modifications:

    2969 missense mutations, 1965 synonymous mutations, 484 mutations in the non-coding regions, 142 non-coding deletions, 100 in-frame deletions, 66 non-coding insertions, 36 stop-gained variants, 11 frameshift deletions and two in-frame insertions

This substantial number of genomic variation has led to the emergence of, at least 14 distinct variants, including the ‘English variant’ which displays 23 detectable mutations, 70% of them being located on its spike protein, which is the very target of the Pfizer ‘vaccine’.

SARS-COV-2 variants

Some of the SARS-COV-2 variants

Coincidentally, or not, the above mentioned Remdevisir has been tested on British patients in at least 15 different health centers and widely administered after its bogus approval. Redemsivir is now known to trigger mutations in SARS-COV-2, particularly in its spike protein. Given its mutagenic property and its use in the UK, the obvious question is “Did remdesivir play a role in the apparition of the English variant?”

In any case, just in Marseilles no less than 33 documented cases of patients fell sick twice, from the variant called Marseille 1, then from the variant Marseille 4. Worse than that, still in Marseilles, one patient got infected three times with SARS-CoV-2 variants in just nine months. Marseilles is no exception, in Manaus, Brazil the first epidemic of COVID-19 conferred virtually no immunity against subsequent variants:

    between 44% and 66% of the population of Manaus was infected with SARS-CoV-2 by July […] Our data show that >70% of the population had been infected in Manaus about 7 months after the virus first arrived in the city.

Reinfection with SARS-COV-2 is so widespread that scientists do not wonder any more if it happens, but how it happens:

    the possibility of reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 is not well understood.[…] previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 does not necessarily translate to guaranteed total immunity. The implications of reinfections could be relevant for vaccine development[…] Genomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 showed genetically significant differences between each variant associated with each instance of infection

Those reinfections suggest that natural immunity against COVID-19 could last just a few months, one reason for this short immunity is probably the numerous mutations of SARS-CoV-2. If natural immunity doesn’t prevent a quick re-infection, the Pfizer ‘vaccine’, that, unlike natural immunity only targets a small part of the virus – namely its spike protein, which has substantially changed since the design of the vaccine – should exhibit even poorer results. In conclusion, the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ is unlikely to confer lasting immunity, if any, especially against current and future variants.

The above is not just theory. For example in Israel no less than 12,400 residents have tested positive for SARS-COV-2 after receiving the Pfizer “vaccine”, among them 69 people who had already gotten the second dose.

Pfizer Vaccine Methodology

1/ Irrelevant investigation objectives

A stunning bias in the Pfizer trial was its primary objective: evaluate the frequency of mild to severe forms of COVID-19, 28 days after the first inoculation. Casualty rate, infectiousness, duration of immunity (if any), or even occurrence of mild to severe forms in the long term were not investigated. But, wait a minute, the whole pandemic and vaccine hysteria were built on these very fears of death and contamination, we heard ad nauseam the media injunctions: “people are dying in droves”, “get vaccinated to avoid infecting others”, “get vaccinated to be immune to COVID-19”, “get vaccinated to avoid dying of COVID-19” etc.

2/ Tested group bias

Another striking bias is the trial selection, particularly the age combined with health status. We’ve shown above that frail and elderly people are by far the most likely to suffer from COVID-19. But only 2% of the Pfizer trial includes patients over 75 years old and with pre-existing medical conditions. In addition subjects of any age with comorbities are grossly under-represented:

    In total, only one out of five of the people appear to have an underlying condition, and for the various individual underlying conditions, the percentage of people suffering from them is often less than 1%.

Also the limited size of the vaccine group (about 20,000 participants) does not exhibit all the age/race/sex/disease/treatment/genetic profile combinations that the general population does. There is no safety data whatsoever about children, immune-compromised individuals or pregnant women because they were excluded from the trial.

Basically Pfizer selected young and healthy subjects for testing a vaccine that is now administered as a priority to old and sick individuals. What is the point of studying healthy young individuals, who, vaccinated or not, are barely affected by COVID-19 anyway? Does this bias minimize side effects and maintain the illusion of a safe ‘vaccine’?

3/ Placebo instead of known effective drugs

A new drug is tested against a placebo when the targeted disease has no known cure. In the case of COVID-19, there are several known cures to which Pfizer should have compared its vaccine.

That was the design of the Discovery clinical trial that compared Remdesivir, HCQ and other drugs. When the preliminary results started to show that HCQ was the most effective, it was quickly removed from the trials. Pfizer didn’t make the same mistake of testing its new drug against an effective one. Instead, they tested their ‘vaccine’ against a placebo.

4/ Unilateral design and treatment of data

No third party was involved in the design of the trial, its monitoring, and the treatment of the results. The whole study was designed, conducted, analyzed, published and paid for by Pfizer itself.

As Dutch neurologist Jan B. Hommel said:

    “The fact that an independent data and safety committee was able to see the data doesn’t change this, simply because they had no say in the design of the research, selection of the participants, the statistics used or the publication. … I don’t need to explain here how such a construction can lead to biased results of scientific research, because it has been extensively researched and published about over the past twenty years.”


The main marketing argument for the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ is its alleged 95% efficacy. This figure is the sole claim of Pfizer and it should be taken with a grain of salt because of numerous factors:

1/ Pfizer precedent

First we have to understand the background of the company we are dealing with here. Pfizer is the world’s largest pharmaceutical company and it is also the company that has been hit with the second biggest criminal fine in US history for lying about one of their drugs and bribing doctors. This record fine is only one example. Pfizer has been sentenced numerous times for covering up major side effects of Protonix, hiding the cancer-inducing properties of Prempro, lying about the suicidal behavior induced by Chantix, promoting Depo-Testosterone as effective and safe while it was ineffective and induces major side effects, and conducting illegal clinical trials for Trovan in Nigeria killing 11 children. The list of crimes committed by Pfizer goes on and on.

Let’s also keep in mind that Pfizer will cash in $14 billion a year, more than the GDP of Nicaragua, from the worldwide sale of its RNA ‘vaccine’.

2/ Relative efficacy VS absolute efficacy

During the Pfizer clinical trial 8 COVID-19 cases were found in the vaccine group of 20,000 and 86 cases in the placebo group of 20,000. This means the attack rate for COVID-19 is 0.0004 in the vaccine group and 0.0043 in the placebo group. Therefore, the absolute risk reduction for an individual is only about 0.4% (0.0043-0.0004X100).

The Number Needed To Vaccinate (NNTV) = 256 (1/0.0039), which means that to prevent just 1 Covid-19 case, 256 individuals must get the vaccine; the other 255 individuals derive no benefit, but are subject to the numerous adverse effects of the ‘vaccine’ .

3/ Exclusion of suspicious cases

The claimed 95% (relative) efficacy was attained by excluding 3410 total cases of suspected, but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases (probably due to false negatives). When those 3410 suspected cases are reintegrated the relative efficacy drops to 19% (which is well below the 50% effectiveness threshold set by regulators) and the absolute risk reduction drops to a ridiculous 0.08%.

4/ Non-replicated results

The cornerstone of any scientific work is its replicability. The results of the clinical trial were published in a journal at the end of 2020, but the clinical trials have not been replicated and they are unlikely to be replicated because no pharmaceutical company will conduct pricey clinical trials for a molecule patented by a competitor. So all we have is the word of Pfizer, who we also see is a repeat offender.

In summary, according to Pfizer, the benefit of its vaccine is a reduction of flu like symptoms in the young healthy population. They don’t know, or rather, they don’t want us to know, about what really matters: symptoms in the frail and elderly, mortality, infectiousness, or duration of immunity. We’re starting to get an idea.

The irony is that the ‘vaccine’ didn’t even reach its primary (and irrelevant) objective that was the reduction of the severe form of COVID-19. In the editorial of the NEJM where the results of the Pfizer clinical trial were published, one can read:

    The number of severe cases of COVID-19 (one in the vaccine group and nine in the placebo group) is too small to draw any conclusions about whether the rare cases that occur in vaccinated persons are actually more severe.

Risks of the Pfizer Vaccine

Not much is known about the benefits of the Pfizer vaccine and the little that is claimed is quite irrelevant. But information about the risks is slowly coming in, and it’s not a pretty picture.

1/ Adverse effects of the vaccine

According to the FDA, the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ can cause many serious “adverse effects”, and these are only the known adverse effects induced by “traditional” vaccines and their usual adjuvants:

Adverse effect of the Pfizer vaccine

The long term effects of vaccines are known to be the most devastating ones. So, in addition to the list above, it’s highly probable that numerous additional serious adverse effects induced by RNA ‘vaccines’ will be progressively identified, like Lou Gehrig disease, Alzheimer’s, cancer and multiple sclerosis as suggested by Judy Mikovitz.

Infertility will probably be another “unexpected” long term side effect since the targeted spike protein is very similar to sincytin, a protein involved in placental development. When Pfizer tested their ‘vaccines’ on rats, they reported a 50% drop in reproductive behavior compared to the unvaccinated rats. It’s probably to hide this side effect that Pfizer excluded pregnant women from its trial.

Conveniently, the adverse vaccine reactions listed above are increasingly considered by authorities as a consequence of COVID-19. This is true of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) which, since December 2020 and soon after the beginning of the vaccination campaign, is said to be caused by COVID-19. Until then, no causality between the two was claimed, only a worsening of COVID-19 symptoms in patients with GBS. The same was done for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children, which is now considered as being caused by SARS-COV-2, and for the Kawasaki syndrome, a known vaccine reaction now blamed on COVID-19.

To further minimize the potentially devastating effects of the Pfizer ‘vaccine’, a CDC report labels anaphylaxis as the cause for a growing number of adverse reactions.

It would all be fine and dandy, except when you calculate the incidence percentage for these events you get the following numbers:

Dec.14: 3/679 = 0.4%

Dec.15: 50/6,090 = 0.8%

Dec.16: 373/27,823 = 1.3%

Dec.17: 1,476/67,963 = 2.2%

Dec.18: 3,150/112,807 = 2.8%

As you can see the incidence ratio of “anaphylaxis” keeps increasing. It increased seven-fold from 0.4 to 2.8% over a mere 5 days, which suggests that the vaccine has delayed adverse effects that can take days to manifest. The problem is that anaphylaxis is known to manifest almost immediately after exposure to the allergenic agent:

    Symptoms can start within seconds or minutes of exposure to the food or substance you are allergic to and usually will progress rapidly. On rare occasions there may be a delay in the onset of a few hours

It means that there are probably other (delayed) adverse reactions going on besides (immediate) anaphylaxis.

2/ Negative reactions to the vaccine

On top of the adverse effects we must add the negative reactions. The table below recapitulates reactions to the Pfizer vaccine (according to Pfizer) at the second inoculation:

Reported side effects of the Pfizer vaccine

There’s a caveat though. This table focuses solely on the 18-55 year old sub-group, basically the young and healthy individuals, who seldom develop a severe form of COVID-19 let alone die from it.

The frequency of the side effects is high: 59% experience fatigue, 52% experience headache, 37% muscle pain. Virtually every patient experienced side effects. The severity of the symptoms is quite appalling too. For example, 38% of those young and healthy subjects experienced moderate to severe fatigue and 26% experienced moderate to severe headache. “Moderate” meaning interfering with activity and “severe” meaning preventing daily activity.

In contrast, the general population has a more than 60% probability of having no symptoms after contracting SARS-COV-2. The relatively young and healthy subpopulation selected by Pfizer has about an 80% probability of being asymptomatic. So, on one side we have the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ with its 100% guaranteed side effects, on the other side we have the 80% symptom-free SARS-COV-2.

Is this vaccine causing more symptoms than the disease it is supposed to cure?

Notice in the table above that, just like the table for adverse vaccine reactions, only negative reactions soon after inoculation are recorded. The occurrence of negative reactions more than two months after the first inoculation were simply not investigated.

It means that we have no idea whatsoever about the medium and long term risks of the ‘vaccine’.

3/ Vaccine deaths

Death was listed in the FDA’s list of adverse reactions, and the FDA was right. Several deaths occurred soon after vaccination. At first, it seemed like sporadic cases. One death, then a second death occurred in Israel soon after inoculation. Around the same time a similar death occurred in Switzerland. And then a Florida doctor died soon after receiving the Pfizer ‘vaccine’.

The case of Norway is more interesting with 2 vaccine deaths in the beginning of January followed by 23 deaths in one elderly home. That’s a total of 25 vaccine deaths while about 20,000 doses have been administered in Norway in the weeks preceding the “incidents”. So, the vaccine fatality rate is about 0.125% which is comparable to the CFR of COVID-19 mentioned above. And those vaccine-induced deaths are only the early ones and after just one inoculation.

Even more shocking is the case of Nice nursing homes, with 50 excess deaths on January 15th, only 4 days after the start of vaccinations. During those four days, about 16,000 doses of the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ were administered in the homes. That gives a preliminary vaccine fatality rate higher than 0.3%, which is more than double the CFR of COVID-19 and, again, this death toll is limited to a few days after the very first inoculation.

Norway and Nice are not isolated cases. After the first inoculation of Pfizer ‘vaccine’ on 5,847 patients in Gibraltar, 53 of them died within days. That’s a vaccine fatality rate of 0.9%. A New York nursing home which had experienced zero COVID-19 death before vaccination, reported 24 deaths right after the vaccination of 193 residents. That’s a vaccine fatality rate of 12%. The list of vaccine casualties goes on and on, and this is just after the first dose.

Is the medicine deadlier than the disease it is supposed to cure?

Of course, the authorities deny any link between vaccinations and these deaths. They blame comorbidities. When a vaccinated individual with comorbidities dies, it’s because of the comorbidities. When an alleged SARS-COV-2 positive individual with comorbidities dies, it’s because of the SARS-COV-2. Does that make sense?


COVID-19 is a benign disease for which safe and effective treatments exist. But those treatments are banned or suppressed while a dangerous and ineffective RNA vaccine is imposed on us through blackmail: no vaccine = no freedom.

Tens of millions have already been vaccinated, so, if you must take the vaccine, here is an article describing therapeutic and nutritional approaches to mitigate its side effects.

The elites don’t want to protect us, they want to control us. Those self-proclaimed reality creators manufactured an ‘obedience’ vaccine which backfired royally and transformed into a ‘disobedience’ mutant.

So, they created out of thin air a fake pandemic in order to impose a vaccine that I believe is designed to cancel the beneficial effects of the ‘disobedience’ mutant. In addition, this vaccine is deadlier and more harmful than the minor disease it is supposed to cure.

But as we will see in the next installment, instead of putting on a show of preventing a fake pandemic, the RNA vaccine might very well recombine with dormant endoretroviruses and start a very real pandemic in a second epic backfire. If this comes to pass, it would show again that history has a superb sense of irony.

Notes: Some of the links in this article lead to videos in French of IHU Lab researchers like Didier Raoult, Louis Fouché, Michel Drancourt or Philippe Parola. Outside China, the IHU Laboratory has published the most papers about SARS-COV-2 to date. These researchers therefore have a unique knowledge of the “pandemic”, unfortunately their video presentations are mostly in French.

Pierre Lescaudron (Profile)

Pierre Lescaudron (M.Sc., MBA) pursued a career in executive management, consulting and post-graduate teaching in high tech fields.

He then became an editor and writer for, fulfilling his dream of researching science, technology and history.

14 thoughts on “Depopulation by ‘vaccination’…”

  1. God bless you for writing this article! I have printed it for myself and taken screenshots so that I can send it to my computer illiterate friends 🙂


  2. One reason why I wouldn’t take their GMO shit:

    IF people try to pressure, force you or lure you to put something in your body you don’t need, why on earth would you accept that?

    Lots of gullible people out there, lots of them and the worse thing is: they think they are doing the right thing…


  3. A new Nuremberg trial will have to be setup to judge criminals like pfizer/biontech, moderna, bill gates and his accomplices, many corrupt politicians (biden, trump, johnson, merkel, macron, draghi, sanchez..), many so-called ‘experts’ and ‘health officials’ (fauci, drosten,.) and of course most media executives and many so-called ‘journalists’ who are responsible of the deaths of millions by their fear propaganda campaigns.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Like in the 1940’s, people couldn’t believe or accept the idea that someone would be so evil as to industrially exterminate them.

    So they let themselves be driven to camps without a fight…

    without a fight.

    “It is easier to deceive people than to convince them that they have been deceived.”

    — Mark Twain


    “We now live in a world where doctors destroy health,
    lawyers destroy justice,
    universities destroy knowledge,
    governments destroy freedom,
    the press destroys information,
    religion destroys morals,
    and banks destroy the economy”.

    – Chris Hedges


  5. There is a genocide going on, a worldwide genocide organized by mass murderers of the pharmaceutical industry and billionaires like bill gates with the help of corrupt criminal politicians and nobdoy does anything!!!??

    What’s wrong with you people?! Thye kill your elders, they inject your children with poison and you do nothing!!

    They open concentration camps in New zealand, canada and germany (for the second time in less than a hundred years) and you don’t even complain about it!!!


    All the assholes wearing masks, applauding the criminals on TV, helping the neo-nazis behind this global coup are accomplices of their crimes and will have to pay for it!


  6. We need to inform people, our families, friends, neighbors, colleagues, they have to know the truth. What they inject now will trigger in the next months something 1000 times worse than what this is now.

    Why do people trust criminals like pfizer, moderna, j&j, governments and the WHO. Why are people so ignorant?

    The information is there on the web for free.


  7. Six months ago, the sheeple were shouting at us ‘conspiracy theorist’ because we were telling them the truth: that the goal was vaccinate the entire populations and force ‘id’s, or certifcates on them without which you couldn’t shop, travel or live.

    The blackmail was and is: no freedom or return to ‘normal’ if you don’t accept to be raped, injected and marked like beasts.

    Now that this is happenning, the same sheeple shout at us ‘conspiract theories’ for telling exactly what is happening.

    Sheeple, masked morons, covid cult members and other psychotic lunatics who want you to submit like them ‘for your own good’ (for their own in reality as they know they are being fooled but can’t bear the thought of it) don’t want to hear the truth, they want to sleep at night, they want to stay on their sorry ass in front of netflix, they want to keep playing with their addictive gadgetry, they want to stay in the illusion of living.

    They don’t give a damn about freedom, human rights, democracy, they’d rather condemn their children to a future of slavery, sickness and misery rather than get out of their pathetic, illusory comfort zones.

    The illusion of everything is enough for them, this is why the criminals who want to control them have such an easy job, they know who they are dealing with: cowards, ignorants, superstitious morons and lazy bastards.

    The sheeple will get what comes at them sooner or later.

    Giving away your pride, your human dignity, your rights, your freedom, going down on your knees like slaves, letting them treat you like farm animals for the illusion of safety and comfort has a price.

    They want to be robots, animals, slaves? This is what they will be.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you Julia for your comment, we will post it on the site if you are fine with that, as we couldn’t have said it more rightly. Thanks again.


  8. You can be sure that the number are 50 times higher than the number reported.

    When they inflate covid19 deaths, they make sure to triple count, add other deaths, fraud death certificates and count morbid preconditions.

    When they ‘report’ adverse events, they do exactly the contrary, remove most of it to make the human cattle believe it’s safe to get injected by mrna poison.

    Wait few months and we will see the real effects of this!


  9. The Inanity of RNA Vaccines For COVID-19: Great article. It says it all.

    They now pretend there is a third wave when there was not even a first one.

    In a sane world, this kind of article would make the headlines of any serious news paer or website. In our delusional fake world, it’s censored.

    The only objection is about the ‘obligation’ to take their poison vaccines. The choice between freedom and gettting posioned and marked like animals.

    I say fuck them, fuck bill gates, the WHO, the corrupt politicians, their stooges, the ‘health’ authorities, the corrupt medical and pharma assholes, all of them.

    People are now dying by the thousands thanks to their killer vaccine 9only few percents are reported). Those who don’t die get real infections with a disease they don’t even know about.

    In few months, they will die by millions.


    It’s not nice to say that but it’s true.

    I and my friends and family have never complied to any of the insane demands the criminals tried to impose on us since the start of this fake pandemic, we are not going to start to obey now.

    If it comes to serious confrontation, let’s do it, better now than later!

    They can stick their vaccines up their a…

    Liked by 1 person

  10. So it was true, what sheeple and TV parrots call ‘conspiracy theories’ is true, what son of a bitch bill gates prepares since decades is true. He first tested it on African people because he knows corrupt governments in Africa will let him do whatever he wants for money, then India, and now Europe and the USA where people have become so dumb that they believe thre is a ‘pandemic’ and that their own genocide is for their own good!

    We have to unite and take them down!

    Liked by 1 person

  11. You would wonder why so many people believe in the science fiction created by mainstream media and puppet governments on behalf of their sponsors:

    Many people really think they are wearing masks, be put in jail in their own homes and getting poison injected for ‘THE GREATER GOOD’.

    Everytime you hear this ‘THE GREATER GOOD’ mantra, you should look who is stealing money from your pocket.

    They believe like cult members believe in their cult leader that by submitting to all the absurd demands of corrupt governments, they help their community (which by the way is being utterly destroyed by these very demands).

    You can’t reason cult members, you can’t argue with logic, science and facts with people who have been manipulated to the point that they believe they are working for the good of others.

    You’d rather have enemies who hate you than people who want to impose you what they believe is good for you.

    These pople can’t think anymore as they chose to believe rather than check the reality of the situation (like empty hopsitals) and the facts (like 90% false positives for pcr tests, no excess deaths, etc..).

    Most totalitarian regimes are born because the populations agreed or did nothing to stop them.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s