“Look into My Eyes”, “It’s For Your Safety”

It’s always “for your safety”, house arrests, forced masking, fines, jail, oppression, discrimination, repression, police ultra-violence, coerced vaccinations with deadly barely tested experimental products and ‘vaccination passports’, all these are for ‘your safety’

The worse thing is not that they are doing it to us, but that a large portion of the population believe their lies.

Is it Snow White or Emer Crooked the big pharma shill at the EMA?

Let’s have a look at facts and numbers that contradict their claims:

USA: 2,249 KILLED & 50,861 INJURED by experimental shots from Pfizer/Biontech,Moderna and J&J

Source: US government CDC VAERS (Vaccines Adverse Events Reporting System). https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=CAT&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19

Europe: 4576 KILLED – 199,213 INJURED by experimental shots from Pfizer/biontech, Moderna & Oxford/Astrazeneca

Source: EudraVigilance  http://www.adrreports.eu/en/index.html

UK: 713 KILLED – 495,345 INJURED by experimental shots from fizer/Biontech and Oxford/Astrazeneca

95 New Deaths Recorded this Week in the UK Following AZ COVID Shots

That is an increase of 119 deaths and 90,820 injuries recorded since last week. 95 of the 119 recorded deaths this past week followed AstraZeneca COVID injections.

More than 20 countries had suspended injections of the AstraZeneca experimental COVID shots due to concerns over fatal blood clots, but the European Medicines Agency (EMA) urged countries to resume vaccinations because “the benefits outweigh the risks.”

Some nations resumed the shots, such as Germany, but now have halted them again due to more deaths resulting from blood clots.


Andof course part of the world economic forum clique

Canada Suspends AstraZeneca COVID Shot – 2,530 Injuries and 24 DEAD Following Mostly Pfizer and Moderna Shots

Germany Indefinitely Suspends AstraZeneca ‘Vaccinefor Anyone Under Age 60

Is it because mass murderer and criminal against Humanity, chancellor for life merkel wanst to get rid of older people or is it to make sure younger ones get injected with mRNA DNA altering tech from criminals Pfizer/biontech or Moderna?

One thing’s for sure, it’s not about people’s health.

Former Pfizer VP to AFLDS: ‘Entirely possible this will be used for massive-scale depopulation’

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) spoke to former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer Dr. Mike Yeadon about his views on the COVID-19 vaccine, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the regulatory authorities, and more.

At the outset, Dr. Yeadon said “I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being perpetrated against a large proportion of the world’s population.”

“I feel great fear, but I’m not deterred from giving expert testimony to multiple groups of able lawyers like Rocco Galati in Canada and Reiner Fuellmich in Germany.

“I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil (not a determination I’ve ever made before in a 40-year research career) and dangerous products.”

“In the U.K., it’s abundantly clear that the authorities are bent on a course which will result in administering ‘vaccines’ to as many of the population as they can. This is madness, because even if these agents were legitimate, protection is needed only by those at notably elevated risk of death from the virus. In those people, there might even be an argument that the risks are worth bearing. And there definitely are risks which are what I call ‘mechanistic’: inbuilt in the way they work.

“But all the other people, those in good health and younger than 60 years, perhaps a little older, they don’t perish from the virus…
In this large group, it’s wholly unethical to administer something novel and for which the potential for unwanted effects after a few months is completely uncharacterized.

For so-called ‘vaccines’ that don’t provide immunity against a virus not worse than a flu, but certainly can create any pathogen including the very one it pretends to fight:

Growing Number of COVID Cases Among Fully Vaccinated

Washington, Florida, South Carolina, Texas, New York, California and Minnesota have all reported breakthrough cases of COVID.

The Washington State Department of Health (DOH) announced Tuesday it is investigating reports of people who tested positive for COVID more than two weeks after being fully vaccinated against the disease.


6000% Increase in Reported Vaccine Deaths 1st Quarter 2021 Compared to 1st Quarter 2020 

You can’t expect to run trials that should be run on animals on human beings and don’t kill thousands of them. The people who are doing that and those who allowed it are criminals against humanity. It includes the little nurse who can’t pretend that she’s just doing her job!

As can be expected when new experimental “vaccines” that are not approved by the FDA are given emergency use authorization to fight a “pandemic” that is now over a year old, reported deaths following the injections have now skyrocketed in the U.S. population by over 6000% here at the end of the first quarter of 2021, as compared to recorded deaths following FDA-approved vaccines at the end of the first quarter of 2020.

These new products, which many doctors and scientists claim do not even meet the legal definition of a “vaccine,” are described by the manufacturers themselves as “operating systems” and prior to “COVID” they have never been approved to be used on human populations.

There are literally thousands of doctors and scientists around the world who have spoken out against these experimental injections, some even calling them “biological weapons of mass destruction.”

Their voices are censored in the pharma-controlled corporate media and by Big Tech, so the people dying and becoming injured by these injections are the pro-vaccine people who primarily only get their information from these censored sources that are funded by Wall Street corporate billionaires, such as Bill Gates.

French drug agency links AstraZeneca vaccine with blood clots

Even the mainstream media seems to acknowledge the injuries and deaths caused by the experimental Oxford-Astrazeneca concoction, but keep hiding and ignoring the deaths and injuries caused by other criminal manufacturers like Pfizer/biontech and Moderna, despite the evidence that their mRNA gene ‘therapy’ products killed and injured as much as Oxford-Astrazeneca.

U.K. Gov. release 8th update on reported Adverse Reactions to the Covid Jabs via MHRA Yellow Card Scheme

Well we can confirm that in the space of seven weeks the number of reported adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine has increased by 119.6%, now standing at a total of 108,649 adverse reactions as of the 14th March. The Oxford jab has fared much worse though with an astounding increase of 1301.77% (but there are more people jabbed with Oxford-Astra than with Pfizer in the UK) in the number of reported adverse reactions between the 24th January and the 14th March, now standing at a total of 294,820. This now means the current rate of people suffering a serious adverse reaction after having one of the experimental Covid “vaccines” stands at 1 in every 166 people (which incidentally is way higher than the alleged ‘covid death rate).

The remaining adverse events come from ‘unspecified brand’ ‘vaccines’ (Moderna? J&J janssen?).

The terrifying thing about this is around only 1% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme, with many people not even knowing of its existence.

EXCERPTS to download:

And in the USA, it certainly not ‘Oxford-Astra’ killing and harming people with their experimental substances:

Number of COVID Vaccine Injuries Reported to VAERS Surpasses 50,000, CDC Data Show

VAERS data released today showed 50,861 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 2,249 deaths and 7,726 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and March 26, 2021.

Data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on the number of injuries and deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID vaccines revealed steadily rising numbers, but no new trends. VAERS is the primary mechanism for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.

Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received to the system as of Friday of the previous week. Today’s data show that between Dec. 14, 2020, and March 26, a total of 50,861 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 2,249 deaths — an increase of 199 over the previous seven days — and 7,726 serious injuries, up 631 over the same time period.

Of the 2,249 deaths reported as of March 26, 28% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, 19% occurred within 24 hours and 43% occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

From the 3-26-2021 release of VAERS data.

This week’s VAERS data show:

  • 19% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
  • 45% of those who died were male, 43% were female and the remaining death reports did not include gender of the deceased.
  • The average age of those who died was 77.7 and the youngest death was an 18-year-old.
  • As of March 26, 341 pregnant women had reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 104 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
  • Of the 578 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 63% of cases were reported after Pfizer-BioNTech — almost twice as many as reported (36%) following vaccination with the Moderna ‘vaccine’. Seven cases of Bell’s Palsy were reported with Johnson & Johnson (J&J) vaccine (1%).
  • There were 2,578 reports of anaphylaxis, with 53% of cases attributed to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, 44% to Moderna and 3% to J&J vaccine, which was rolled out in the U.S. on March 2.
  • Using a broadened search for any reference to anaphylaxis in chart notes resulted in 15,193 reports, with 52% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 45% to Moderna and 3% to J&J. With each ‘vaccine’, nearly 42% of anaphylactic reports occurred in people aged 17-44.

On March 8, The Defender contacted the CDC with questions about reported deaths and injuries related to COVID vaccines. We provided a written list of questions about how the CDC conducts investigations into reported deaths, the status of investigations on deaths reported in the media, if autopsies are being done and the standard for determining whether an injury is causally connected to a vaccine.

We also inquired about whether healthcare providers are reporting all injuries and deaths that might be connected to the COVID vaccine, and what education initiatives are in place to encourage and facilitate proper and accurate reporting.

It took the CDC 22 days to respond to our repeated inquiries. When someone did, the person told us the agency had never received the questions — even though the employees we talked to several times said their press officers were working through the list of questions and were reviewing the email we sent. We provided the questions again yesterday, and requested a response by April 7.


The most surprising thing is that plenty of people now agree with the neo-nazis who took over the world that unvaccinated people (for a disease that doesn’t require any vaccination) should be discriminated like the Nazis or communists discriminated and eventually eliminated all the undesirables (Jews, Gypsies, political opponents, bourgeois, Kulaks, dissidents, handicapped people, etc…)

This is why they are now rushing to ‘vaccinate’ our children and force mask them. In Cambodia, during the Khmer red terror, the khmer rouge brainswashed children who were then pushed to kill their own parents.

Have a look at the Nuremberg code to realize the extent of the crimes committed against humanity by the Mengele of our times:

And the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948:

This is the purpose behind the ‘vaccination passport’: control, apartheid, segregation and elimination of the non compliants. Again, the worst thing happening is that so many people agreed to self muzzle, to self censor, to self isolate and self imprison in their homes. They now self inflict harm to themselves and their kids with deadly poison and want to force others to become as stupid as they have become.

Those who have done their research (for free on the web, accessible by anyone who knows how to read and browse, no diploma, or rocket science studies needed), know what the agenda is. They don’t even hide it anymore, they spit it in your face: “by 2030, you will own nothing (meaning they will rob your possessions), and you will be happy about it “(perhaps after 10 years of injecting drugs and genetical modifications, the human race will be on par with cattle).

Goodbye War on Terror, Hello Permanent ‘Pandemic’

A scary article from Robert F. Kennedy’s CHD, but they simply expose existing plans.

What happened to the War on Terror? World leaders have swapped it out for a new narrative: the permanent pandemic, where society will be controlled under the guise of “pathogen vigilance.”

Those in positions of power have long recognized that conditions of fear and panic furnish exploitable opportunities to restructure society. COVID-19 is certainly a textbook example of this observation, illustrating that well-tuned fear campaigns can persuade many people to abandon essential medical and individual freedoms.

One of the key elements in the propagandist’s toolkit for perpetuating fear is repetition, particularly if the fear messages come from different directions and sources and are cloaked in a veneer of officialdom and respectability.

Thus, in the first few months of 2021, we have seen a proliferation of admonishments telling Americans that pandemics pose an “existential threat” to the United States and are here to stay.

‘Existential threats’ — history repeats itself

In January, a bipartisan commission released a dramatic 44-page report calling for an “Apollo Program for Biodefense,” explicitly comparing the proposal to the efforts that first landed humans on the moon. The commission laid the groundwork for its report in 2015, when it published a National Blueprint for Biodefense.

Now, seizing the COVID-19 moment, the commission is making the case for a vastly expanded biodefense budget — amounting to billions of biodefense dollars annually — to implement its conveniently ready-to-go blueprint.

Full article here: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/permanent-pandemic-covid-19

It is where we realize that all the covid operation is the biggest scam of all times, bigger even than the war on terror which required actual terrorists (or state sponsored ones) and real terror attacks (even false flag ones) to convince people to giveup so much of their freedom, rights and privacy.

For the covid SCAM, they don’t even need to stage terror attacks or to help external groups to terorrize populations, they just have to broadcast fake news 24/7 without any shred of real evidence that there is a ‘pandemic’. Thye just have to tell people to stay home and pretend that empty hospitals are full of dying people.

They just have to change the rules for death certificates, forbid autopsies, forbid families to enquire, and authorize any manipulation to defraud death certificates. They juts need to pay health centres more to declare any disease as ‘covid’ to inflate cases and deaths.

Finally, they just have to use a totally flawed testing system, the RT-PCR, not fit for any medical diagnosis as its inventor, Karry Mullis told many times and as any real science study proves, but it doesn’t matter as the people they need to convince are ignorant credulous and fearful mainstream media followers. Before they needed an actual war to convince people of a danger, now they just need the media to broadcast the illusion of danger to create and perpetuate fear.

A Deceptive Construction – Why We Must Question The COVID 19 Mortality Statistics

by Iain Davis – UK Column

Taking everything into account, from high rates of comorbidity, to low rates of symptomatic individuals, the impact of false positives on testing and a death certification regime heavily biased towards recording COVID-19 as the underlying cause, then it is reasonable to conclude that the total number of deaths from Covid-19 is not 148,000, nor 126,000, but much closer to 15,000.

According to the UK Government, as of 27 March 2021, 126,515 people have died as a result of contracting Covid-19, and an additional 21,610 people have died with COVID-19 on their death certificates.

The government alleges, therefore, that a total of 148,125 people in the UK have died as a result of COVID-19. As we shall see, this claim is not credible.

Justifiable Policy?

Claims about mortality have been used by both the government and the mainstream media to justify the policy response.

The pace of change driven by that policy response has been astonishing. With Health Secretary Matt Hancock’s recent announcement of the creation of the UK Health Security Agency and its commitment to take “action to mitigate infectious diseases and other hazards to health before they materialise,” it is clear the government’s new (ab)normal is here to stay.

There is clearly an agenda; one entirely founded upon the idea that COVID-19 presents a significant threat. The primary evidence offered to substantiate this claim is suggested COVID-19 mortality.

Age Standardised Mortality

Just like nearly every other mortality cause, COVID-19 risks increase proportionately with age. Statistics for those of working age show a population mortality risk of between 0.0166% and 0.0046%, depending upon who you believe. The COVID-19 risk to the working age population is statistically insignificant. For the under 18’s it is statistically zero.

Mortality risk disproportionately impacts men. In 2018 the average age of death for men was approximately 80, and 83 for women in England and Wales.

The average age of COVID-19 death is just over 82. When we look at standard mortality distribution, there is no observable impact from COVID-19.

UK all cause mortality doesn’t suggest any need to panic either.

The ONS released data estimating a total of 607,173 deaths from all causes in England and Wales for 2020. Given demographic changes over time, the ONS use Age Standardised Mortality Rates (ASMR’s) to calculate relative death rates. The ASMR showed that 2020 was the worst year for mortality in the last decade.

ASMR’s were in continual decline throughout the post war period. That decline stopped abruptly in 2009 as the economic impact of the global financial crisis took its toll on public health. Thereafter it showed a marginal rise to 2019. Mortality in 2020 and 2021 should be seen in the context of a global financial crisis that dwarfs the credit crunch of 2008.

ASMR’s fluctuate annually and 2020 showed a significant increase above the 5 year average mortality rate. This was higher than most rises but by no means “unprecedented.” ASMR’s in England since 1938 show similar increases in 1947, 1949, 1951, 1958, 1963, 1970, 1972, 1976, 1985, 1993 and 2014.

Most of these spikes in ASMR’s were in the region of 35 to 45 points. For example, in 2014 the ASMR rose by 40.2, in 1993 by 38.4 and in 1985 by 46.3 points. It rose by 90.5 in 1947, by 83.5 in 1963, it went up by 104.9 in 1970 and in 1951 by 216.3. So the 2020 rise of 118.5 is by no means the worst.

The death toll in 1951 was attributed to the the influenza epidemic which struck some parts of the UK (most notably Liverpool) but left others relatively unscathed. To this day science has struggled to account for this.

2020 not only didn’t have the highest mortality rate in the post war period, it didn’t have the highest mortality rate in the 21st century either. 2020 ranked 9th, out of 20 consecutive years, for all cause mortality in England and Wales. It was the 11th least dangerous year in the last 50.

While there is no statistical evidence of an unprecedented global pandemic in England and Wales (nor in Scotland and Northern Ireland) this tells us little about how many deaths were genuinely attributable to COVID-19. Nor does it indicate at which point we should sacrifice our rights, freedoms, children’s educations and economy in the service of public health.

We certainly didn’t sacrifice them in 1947, 1963, 1970, nor even in 1951. Why was 2020 different?

PCR Does Not Mean COVID

For the purposes of this analysis, we will use the government’s higher claim of 148,000 deaths. The vast majority of these deaths were attributed based upon a positive RT-PCR test. The UK Coronavirus Act makes a clear distinction between the virus and the disease. It states:

    Coronavirus means severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); coronavirus disease means COVID-19 (the official designation of the disease which can be caused by coronavirus).

SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 are not the same thing. The detected presence of SARS-CoV-2 does not mean the person has or will develop COVID-19.

Therefore the attribution of mortality based solely upon a positive test result in no way proves the person died of COVID-19. The extent to which the disease caused or contributed towards a death is a precise medical assessment. The UK government created a death certification and registration process where this did not occur in an unknown number of cases. We need to know what that number is.

COVID-19 has a distinct presentation that requires careful diagnosis. The unique symptoms are severe hypoxemia (low blood oxygen levels), hypercapnia (elevated blood Co2 saturation) and unusually no corresponding loss of respiratory system compliance.

Measurement of gaseous exchange and fluid retention in the lungs appears normal, meanwhile the patient, in serious cases, struggles to breath. This is unlike other influenza like illnesses (ILI’s).

Yet the NHS describe a list of COVID-19 symptoms that could be attributable to any ILI. A high temperature, continuous cough and loss of taste and smell are associated with many. While this is public information, intended to guide our decision to seek medical advice or a test, the list of possible causes expands further given that the NHS state just one of these symptoms possibly indicates COVID-19.

Without precise symptomatic diagnosis, it is difficult to distinguish COVID-19 from a range of other respiratory illnesses. A study from the University of Toronto found:

    The symptoms can vary, with some patients remaining asymptomatic, while others present with fever, cough, fatigue, and a host of other symptoms. The symptoms may be similar to patients with influenza or the common cold.

A Cochran Review meta analysis of available studies looked for a clear definition of COVID-19 symptoms. Published in June 2020, the reviewers noted:

    The individual signs and symptoms included in this review appear to have very poor diagnostic properties … Based on currently available data, neither absence nor presence of signs or symptoms are accurate enough to rule in or rule out disease.

Even using advanced diagnostics, such as a computer tomography (CT) scan, won’t always provide a clear result. A study attempting to improve differential diagnosis using CT scans found:

    Although typical and atypical CT image findings of COVID-19 are reported in current studies, the CT image features of COVID-19 overlap with those of viral pneumonia and other respiratory diseases. Hence, it is difficult to make an exclusive diagnosis.

Regardless of their SARS-CoV-2 test status, without a very accurate diagnosis of symptoms, suspected COVID-19 patients could be suffering from one among a range of ILI’s. Again, a positive test result does not mean the patient died from COVID-19, even if they had corresponding symptoms.

Notifications of Infectious Diseases

In England and Wales it is a legal requirement for all registered medical practitioners to notify their local health authority of any suspected cases of notifiable diseases. The list of Notifiable Infectious Diseases (NOIDS) includes COVID-19. This is not optional.

All diagnosing doctors must complete a NOIDS report upon making a diagnosis. Testing laboratories are also required to notify Public Health England (PHE) of positive tests for notifiable diseases.

According to the fact checker FullFact there were 18,152 COVID-19 notifications made by doctors in the whole of 2020.

Yet the government claim that there were 70,853 COVID-19 deaths, never mind cases, in England and Wales in the same year.

Fullfact offered an explanation for this apparent huge discrepancy:

    People with Covid symptoms are advised to get a test, but not to visit their doctor, which may be part of the reason why doctors reported so few cases of the disease through NOIDS. Since Covid became widespread in the UK, and began to be monitored in other ways, it is also possible that doctors felt there was little need to continue notifying PHE about each case.

This is not credible. While it is true that people were told not to go to a doctor if they suspected they had COVID-19, a diagnosis by a doctor was still necessary at some point. Self diagnosis doesn’t usually afford access to hospital treatment. The suggestion by FullFact that doctors unilaterally decided not to bother with their statutory obligations is ridiculous.

What this massive difference between claimed cases, subsequent COVID-19 mortality and NOIDS indicates, is that Doctors were largely reliant upon laboratory testing to fulfil the duty to notify the authorities. This adds considerable weight to the notion that laboratory testing was the leading determinant in the overwhelming majority of COVID-19 diagnosis.

Until mid August 2020, a UK COVID-19 death was reported if the decedent had tested positive at any point during the preceding months. An individual may have have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in March, have died of cancer in August and subsequently have been recorded as a COVID-19 statistic.

The scientific rationale for this did not exist. Research conducted by scientists at Oxford University analysed the COVID-19 Hospitalisation in England Surveillance System (CHESS) and calculated the average time between infection (positive test) and mortality to be 26.8 days.

And so, in response to public and scientific pressure this approach changed to only recording a COVID-19 death within 28 days of a positive test. Still the UK government would not let go of its inflated number system, adding nothing but statistical confusion, they announced:

    In England, a new weekly set of figures will also be published, showing the number of deaths that occur within 60 days of a positive test. Deaths that occur after 60 days will also be added to this figure if COVID-19 appears on the death certificate.

The August methodological change reduced claimed COVID-19 deaths by 5,377 in England alone. This didn’t make any difference to the number of people who had died from COVID-19, it just changed the number of people who had reportedly died from COVID-19.

This wasn’t the only notable change to the data gathering process. Just before the significant spring spike in mortality, on the 30th March 2020, the MSM reported that the government had instructed the ONS to change the way they record COVID-19 deaths. Hitherto the ONS only reported a COVID-19 death if it was recorded as the direct or underlying cause. This was changed to recording “mentions” of COVID-19. A spokesperson for the ONS said:

    It will be based on mentions of Covid-19 on death certificates. It will include suspected cases of Covid-19 where someone has not been tested positive for Covid-19.

The reporting of COVID-19 comorbidity rates was”paused” in July and has yet to resume. The final published ONS analysis that directly reported the number of pre-exiting conditions for deaths “with” COVID-19 mentioned on the death certificate, was released for the period ending 30 June 2020.

From this we learned that 91.1% of alleged COVID deaths had at least 1 serious additional comorbidity. The mean number of comorbidities for a those under 70 was 2.1 and for the vast majority over 70 it was 2.3.

It is preposterous to claim that a decedent who had cancer, pneumonia and had just had surgery, but tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 four weeks earlier, could reasonably be categorised as a COVID-19 death. Yet that is precisely what happened, and continues to happen to this day.

Covid-19 Cures the Flu

COVID-19 also cured influenza and other respiratory disease, such as adenovirus. Early January is always a period of notable influenza outbreaks, resultant hospital admissions and mortality. This is evident if we look at PHE’s Weekly Influenza Report for week 2 in any year prior to 2020.

In 2020, according to the newly combined PHE Weekly Influenza and COVID Report, there have been virtually no cases of influenza, treatment or related deaths.

The ONS note all the details on a death certificate. In their mortality roundup for the January to August 2020 period they stated:

 Influenza and pneumonia was mentioned on more death certificates than COVID-19, however COVID-19 was the underlying cause of death in over three times as many deaths between January and August 2020.

How can flu and pneumonia possibly be on more death certificates than COVID-19 if, as the media and PHE allege, it has been wiped out? It seems the medical profession didn’t get the memo.

A Systemic Catch-22

A positive SARS-CoV-2 test appears to be the primary reason for attribution of mortality. Only the most fastidious diagnosis can differentiate between COVID-19 symptoms and other ILI’s.

Is it credible to believe that flu and pneumonia are on more death certificates but that COVID-19 is deemed the cause of death on three times as many Medical Certificates of Cause of Death (MCCD’s)?

These are somewhat rhetorical questions. The reason why bizarre anomalies like this occurred is because recording COVID-19 as the cause of death was practically unavoidable.

The Coronavirus Act overhauled the MCCD and death registration processes. In addition, World Health Organisation Coding changes and guidance issued by the NHS and other medical authorities combined to create a systemic Catch-22.

In England and Wales an MCCD is completed online using the WHO’s recommended coding.

The MCCD is split into sections.

Part 1. a) “Disease or condition directly leading to death”;

b) “Other disease or condition, if any, leading to (a)”; and c) “Other disease or condition, if any, leading to (b)”.

Part 2 records “Other significant conditions contributing to the death, but not related to the disease or condition causing it.” For example, a person may have died from heart failure caused by pneumonia but obesity, though not directly related to the immediate cause of death, could have contributed and would therefore be recorded in Part 2.

In the case of respiratory disease, the direct cause of death could be Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). This may be brought on by, for example, pneumonia which was caused by influenza. In this instance the direct cause of death would be recorded in Part 1. a) as ARDS, prompted by pneumonia in Part1. b), and the underlying cause would be set as influenza in Part 1. c).

The WHO Family of International Classifications (WHOFIC) Network Classification and Statistics Advisory Committee (CSAC) created new International Classification of Diseases codes (ICD-10 codes) for COVID-19. If the decedent had tested positive, or had been in contact with anyone else who had, a recorded COVID-19 death was practically a fait accompli.

A “confirmed case” was dependent solely upon a positive test result and was given the code U07.1. Observable symptoms were not necessary for U07.1 code to be recorded on a death certificate.

A suspected COVID-19 case was coded as U07.2. A decedent known to have had contact with a SARS-CoV-2 positive person who, while neither testing positive nor having any symptoms themselves, was deemed a suspected/probable COVID-19 case and given the code U07.2.

Neither the U07.1 nor the U07.2 codes required any evidence that the decedent had COVID-19.

As the U07.1 code indicated a “confirmed case,” unless the decedent passed away from something obviously unrelated, such as head trauma, a SARS-CoV-2 positive test would almost automatically confirm COVID-19 as the underlying cause of death.

The WHO clearly described this process in their International MCCD coding guidelines. They defined what death “due” to COVID-19 was:

    A death due to COVID-19 is defined for surveillance purposes as a death resulting from a clinically compatible illness, in a probable or confirmed COVID-19 case, unless there is a clear alternative cause of death that cannot be related to COVID disease (e.g. trauma). There should be no period of complete recovery from COVID-19 between illness and death. A death due to COVID-19 may not be attributed to another disease (e.g. cancer).

A clinically compatible illness could be any ILI. Even if the individual died from cancer, as long as they tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, or the Doctor suspected respiratory distress, the death would be registered as “due to” COVID-19. COVID-19 would again be the reported as the underlying cause.

Additional WHO guidance stated:

    COVID-19 should be recorded on the medical certificate of cause of death for ALL decedents where the disease caused, or is assumed to have caused, or contributed to death. Although both categories, U07.1…and U07.2 ….are suitable for cause of death coding……it is recommended, for mortality purposes only, to code COVID-19 provisionally to U07.1 unless it is stated as probable or suspected.

If a doctor was uncertain and merely suspected a probable COVID-19 case, they were clearly advised to record it on the MCCD as a confirmed case (U07.1 and not U07.2). Again, ensuring it would be reported as the “underlying cause.”

The Office of National Statistics stated:

    Deaths involving the coronavirus (COVID-19) include those with an underlying cause, or any mention, of U07.1 (COVID-19, virus identified) or U07.2 (COVID-19, virus not identified) …

If the Doctor held firm and coded COVID-19 as U07.2 on Part 2 of the MCCD, the ONS (and the NRS and NISA) would still report it as a COVID-19 death.

In the Clear

The Coronavirus Act indemnified all NHS doctors against any claims of malpractice or negligence. It removed the need for a second medical opinion (Medical Examiner), it effectively ruled out both post-mortem examinations and jury-led coroner’s inquests, allowed virtually anyone to act as the qualified informant and facilitated rapid cremation.

In response to the Coronavirus Act and WHO IC10 coding, the NHS issued guidance to doctors for the completion of the Medical Certificate of Cause of Death (MCCD). The COVID-19 death certification and registration process they produced beggars belief. Under the guidance, acting on their own without any corroborating opinion:

    Any medical practitioner with GMC registration can sign the MCCD, even if they did not attend the deceased during their last illness.

Attend doesn’t mean examine either. Checking in with the decedent via Zoom is sufficient. Failing that, if the MCCD signing doctor has only seen the decedent after death, providing they have tested positive, a review of their notes is still sufficient to record a COVID-19 death. The NHS stated COVID-19 could be recorded wherever:

    A medical practitioner has attended the deceased (including visual/video consultation) within 28 days before death, or viewed the body in person after death. (THIS IS RIDICULOUS AND FRAUDULENT)

In keeping with the WHO coding guidelines, there isn’t even any need for a positive test result. The NHS guidance added:

    If before death the patient had symptoms typical of COVID-19 infection, but the test result has not been received, it would be satisfactory to give ‘COVID-19’ as the cause of death … In the circumstances of there being no swab, it is satisfactory to apply clinical judgement.

The NHS then created a system of remote death certification:

    During periods of excess deaths due to COVID-19, healthcare providers are encouraged to redeploy medical practitioners whose role does not usually include direct patient care, such as some medical examiners, to provide indirect support by working as dedicated certifiers, completing MCCDs.

These dedicated certifiers, though medically qualified, are tasked with signing off COVID-19 MCCD’s. GP’s and hospital physicians gather reports, perhaps from a review of the deceased’s medical notes or a video conference with a care home provider, and pass that information to the dedicated COVID-19 certifier for MCCD completion.

The NHS advised that no proof was required for the attribution of a COVID-19 death. They stated:

    Without diagnostic proof, if appropriate and to avoid delay, medical practitioners can circle ‘2’ in the MCCD (information from post-mortem may be available later)

This suggestion that a post mortem may be available is implausible.

Additional guidance issued by the Royal College of Pathologists states:

    If a death is believed to be due to confirmed COVID-19 infection, there is unlikely to be any need for a post-mortem examination to be conducted and the Medical Certificate of Cause of Death should be issued.

Bearing in mind that the WHO had instructed suspected U07.2 deaths to be coded as confirmed U07.1 deaths, the chance of anything other than confirmed COVID-19 death reaching a pathologist is extremely remote. Any MCCD signed “without diagnostic proof” would almost certainly be agreed by the pathologist without further scrutiny. The mere act of putting COVID-19 anywhere on the MCCD was enough to negate the need for a post mortem.

This new death certification system, specifically designed for COVID-19, has understandably caused confusion.

The British Medical Association’s verification of death guidance advises that if no signing doctor has seen the decedent prior to completing the MCCD they should refer it to the coroner. However, this was only a policy recommendation not a legal requirement.

Contradicting this, the Chief Coroner advised:

    COVID-19 is a naturally occurring disease and therefore is capable of being a natural cause of death … The aim of the system should be that every death from COVID-19 which does not in law require referral to the coroner should be dealt with via the MCCD process.

This means that even if a coroner receives a referral from a doctor, they will be highly likely to automatically approve the MCCD without further inquiry. Since a post mortem has already effectively been ruled out, there will be little point in the coroner investigating further.

NHS staff and carers who may have been uncomfortable with all this have been under no illusions. The use of draconian Hospital Trust gagging orders (non disclosure agreements) are widely reported. Carers who have spoken out have been sacked.

To finalise this unbelievable COVID-19 death registration system, the Coronavirus Act also withdrew the standard second opinion required prior to cremation. The need to complete Cremation form 5 was suspended for all COVID-19 deaths. (HOW TO ERASE THE PROOFS)

Alleged COVID-19 decedents can be cremated without any clear evidence that they ever had the disease, regardless of their family’s wishes, swiftly ending any chance of any investigation by sceptical family members.

What was the Cause of Death?

SAGE assessed the UK mean operational false positive rate (FPR) for RT-PCR to be 2.3% of all conducted tests. The government say they have conducted just over 118M tests of which 4.3M were positive. This includes an unknown number of multiple tests of the same individual. A mean FPR of 2.3% suggests 2.7M of those 4.3M positive tests were false positives. This equates to 62.7% of all positive test results.

As we have already discussed it is highly likely that laboratory testing was the primary determinant for a diagnosis of COVID-19. Therefore it is not unreasonable to surmise that at least 50% of claimed COVID-19 deaths were attributed on the basis of false positives.

We can halve the claimed 148,000 to 74,000 COVID-19 deaths.

The 2020 ONS mortality data for England showed a reduction in deaths from a number of other causes.

Deaths from Ischaemic heart diseases were 1,450 below the 5 year average. Cerebrovascular disease was down by 2,276, malignant respiratory neoplasm by 1,537, chronic lower respiratory disease by 2,764 and influenza and pneumonia deaths were 7,313 below the 5 year average. An apparent reduction of 15,340 deaths from other causes.

It seems highly likely that these deaths were wrongly recorded as COVID-19.

As we have seen above, approximately 90% of supposed COVID-19 decedents had at least one other comorbidity. Using the Government’s 148,125 figure, we might claim, therefore that only something like 15,000 of these died of, rather than with.

Is this claim justifiable? Well, consider this:

The Department of Health and Social Care published a study of residents in care homes which purported to show the total number of confirmed cases. Among this number they claimed:

    80.9% of residents who tested positive were asymptomatic.

A meta analysis by the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine found that asymptomatic rates among those who tested positive varied between 5% – 80%. If there are no symptoms, then the disease cannot have contributed towards a death.

Taking everything into account, from high rates of comorbidity, to low rates of symptomatic individuals, the impact of false positives on testing and a death certification regime heavily biased towards recording COVID-19 as the underlying cause, then it is reasonable to conclude that the total number of deaths from Covid-19 is not 148,000, nor 126,000, but much closer to 15,000.

So why the ‘vax’ campaign, why the lockdowns, why the masks, the total loss of freedom, the forced vaccine passports and other complete violations of basic human rights?

Agenda 2030, ‘great reset’, new world order, one world ‘governance’, whatever they call it, it’s a sinister, very sinister agenda, a coup, a takeover that happened last year and for which most people didn’t fight against. It started by by masks, and we are now living in prisons in our own countries without having committed any crimes.

This is an agenda of control over the human race. They have conditionned billions of people to obey to the most insane and absurd orders, justified by nothing but fake ‘science’, media, corporate and state propaganda. it’s a scam, an hoax the biggest sham and social engineering operation of all times.

And, despite its gross idiocy (curfews to fight a virus? Stay at home to fight a virus? Harmful and useless masks?, really?), people believe, they even believe that ‘vaccines’ in phase 3 trial are “safe and effective” ! Because some presstitute, corrupt official or anchor idiot told them!

People in the Middle Ages were supposedly surperstitious, credulous and ignorant, but they had no access to any knowledge, few people could read, even fewer had access to books. Today people have access to the to thousands years of human knowledge for free on the web and yet, they are more stupid, ignorant, superstitious and credulous than peasants of the Middle Ages.

Why? Just because of FEAR?

Fear and Social Control

The following is a transcript of the video:

Fear is one of the most powerful human emotions. While highly useful in situations where threat of immediate harm exists, it is the most debilitating and dangerous of emotions when present unnecessarily. In this video we will examine how fear can be used as a tool to manipulate others, and how those in positions of power, past and present, have effectively used fear to control certain aspects of society.

Humans, especially since the Industrial Revolution, have become increasingly protected from the dangers that our ancestors faced in relation to the natural world. But as mankind’s fear of nature and the elements has fallen, in its place many other fears have come to fill the void. Some of these fears have arisen in response to real threats, but many have been in response to things imagined.

As the Stoic philosopher Seneca pointed out:  

“There are more things…likely to frighten us than there are to crush us; we suffer more often in imagination than in reality.”

While some of these imagined fears are of one’s own making, many are the consequence of narratives created by those in positions of power.

Individuals looking to take advantage of, and manipulate others, have long realized the power of fear. 

When one is gripped by fear of a threat, real or imagined, their rational capacities shut down, making them easily manipulable by anyone that promises safety from the threat.

“No passion so effectually robs the mind of all its powers of acting and reasoning as fear”, wrote the 18th century philosopher Edmund Burke.

Ruling classes for thousands of years have understood the power of intentionally invoking fear in their subjects as a means of social control.

The artificial construction and maintenance of fear in a population by a ruling class has remained pervasive from ancient times up until the modern day.

Oppressive governments often maintain their grip on a nation by continually invoking fear, and then claim that only they, the ruling powers, have the means and ability to protect the population from such a threat:

    “The whole aim of practical politics”, wrote HL Mencken, “is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, most of them imaginary.”

John Adams, one of the founding fathers of America, echoed this sentiment writing “Fear is the foundation of most governments”.

While there are numerous tactics and strategies that have developed over the centuries to effectively exploit the public through fear,  two of the more powerful and efficient are the use of false flags, and the implementation of propaganda via repetition.

A false flag can be defined as a “covert operation . . . designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by entities, groups, or nations other than those who actually planned and executed them”. In his book Feardom, Conor Boyack provides a nice explanation on the effectiveness of false flag attacks for those looking to institute social control:

    “…physical attacks lead to a corresponding increase of trust in political leaders and submission to them. This effect is likely the same whether the attack be a surprise, known to political leaders yet allowed to happen, or directly orchestrated by these same leaders who stand to benefit from the increased trust and submission…False flag operations are used because people generally do not have access to the details, so they are prone to rely upon what they’re told, and thus are easily deceived. People will, for the most part, believe what they are told in times of crisis, and so government officials, whether their motives are good or evil, capitalize on or completely fabricate the crises.” (Feardom: How Politicians Exploit Your Emotions and What You Can Do to Stop Them, Conor Boyack)

Repetition is also a well-known and prevalent propaganda technique used to solidify falsehoods and perpetuate fear in the public consciousness. By repeating specific phrases and warnings, and displaying particular symbols and images over and over through various mediums, those in power are able to paralyze entire populations with a fear psychosis.

The Nazi Propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels was well aware of the power of repetition in cloaking falsehoods in a garb of truth, stating:

    “It would not be impossible to prove with sufficient repetition and a psychological understanding of the people concerned that a square is in fact a circle. They are mere words, and words can be molded until they clothe ideas in disguise.” (Joseph Goebbels)

George Orwell, in a related manner, viewed political language as largely a form of propaganda designed to deceive people, as  he wrote:

    “Political language. . .is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” (George Orwell)

The technological advances of the last century have given those in power the ability to propagate their narratives and engage in fear mongering to an extent never before seen in history. However, despite the unnerving situation we find ourselves in, there is an antidote to the power of propaganda and fear mongering: that being, knowledge.

Plato rightly stated that “ignorance is the root of misfortune”, and as long as we remain ignorant of the fact that all too often those who claim to protect us from fear are actually manipulating our fears for their own benefit, then we will be contributing to the misfortune of the world through our ignorant compliance.

The philosopher Voltaire stated that “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”

To avoid being an individual who can be convinced of absurdities, one must become an active truth seeker, instead of an all too common passive propaganda receiver. An important step in becoming an active truth seeker is the realization that when evaluating the claims of those in power, skepticism is warranted and even necessary. Very often those who rule do not have the best interests of the public at heart; for as  Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn put it “political genius lies in extracting success even from the people’s ruin.”

The reality is that most of us are not in a position to single-handedly change the world, but we can at least try to rid ourselves of the unnecessary fears which are the fuel for so much hate and destruction in the world. In fact, taking responsibility for one’s own actions and the beliefs that motivate such actions, may be the most important thing one can do when faced with the prospect of an oppressive government. For as Stanley Milgram noted: “The disappearance of a sense of responsibility is the most far-reaching consequence of submission to authority.” And furthermore, might there be truth to the comment by  F.A. Harper’s that “the man who knows what freedom means will find a way to be free.”

At this point some may be  thinking that while the use of fear by those in power certainly contributed to horrible situations in the past, most notably in the totalitarian states of Russia, Germany and China in the 20th century, Western nations of the present are far from approaching a situation so dire. Hopefully that is true, but it is important to realize that those who have lived through the rise of oppressive governments have seldom realized the perilous situation they were in until it was too late. We will conclude this lecture with a fascinating but ominous passage from the book They Thought They Were Free, which is based on interviews with normal Germans who lived during the Nazi regime. The following quote comes from one of the German’s interviewed, where he discusses why he thought that more ordinary Germans didn’t take a stand against the rise of the Nazi government.

    “One doesn’t see exactly where or how to move. Believe me, this is true. Each act, each occasion, is worse than the last, but only a little worse… You wait for one great shocking occasion, thinking that others, when such a shock comes, will join with you in resisting somehow…

    But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes. That’s the difficulty. If the last and worst act of the whole regime had come immediately after the first and smallest, thousands, yes, millions would have been sufficiently shocked … But of course this isn’t the way it happens. In between comes all the hundreds of little steps, some of them imperceptible, each of them preparing you not to be shocked by the next…

But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes. That’s the difficulty. If the last and worst act of the whole regime had come immediately after the first and smallest, thousands, yes, millions would have been sufficiently shocked … But of course this isn’t the way it happens. In between comes all the hundreds of little steps, some of them imperceptible, each of them preparing you not to be shocked by the next…

And one day, too late, your principles, if you were ever sensible of them, all rush in upon you. The burden of self-deception has grown too heavy, and some minor incident. . . collapses it all at once, and you see that everything – everything – has changed…Now you live in a world of hate and fear, and the people who hate and fear do not even know it themselves; when everyone is transformed, no one is transformed…” (They Thought They Were Free, Milton Mayer)


“Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth, for being correct, for being you. Never apologize for being correct, or for being years ahead of your time. If you’re right and you know it, speak your mind. Speak your mind.
Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is still the truth.”

Mahatma Gandhi

States rebuke vaccine passports

How did we get from ’15 days to flatten the curve’ to a coerced-at-best-forced-at-worst vaccine passport? The premise of a vaccine ID to reopen misses the point that nearly 20 states are already in various stages of reopening.

Visions of a hunger games scenario are leaping from fiction to a possible future as society continues to be ‘reimagined’ through the vertical consolidation of power offered by Covid’s steamrolling of society.

Vaccine passports, or whatever we’re calling them this week, have only been rolled out in New York…so far. Already, however, a growing number of state lawmakers across America are moving to ban their use through various legislative efforts.

Finding political backbone and drawing lines in the sand, it appears that the vaccine passport is just a step too far for some political leaders.

Front of the pack is Florida’s governor Ron DeSantis who, when asked by reporters just a few short weeks ago if he’ll require proof of vaccination for his state’s residents to reenter society, had this to say:

    “It’s a very, very bad idea…to require someone to show some type of proof of vaccination is completely unacceptable. It’s not something we are going to support here in any way.”

DeSantis backed up his words by signing an executive order on Friday. The order states that:

    “vaccine passports, vaccine passes, or other standardized documentation for the purpose of certifying an individual’s Covid vaccination status to a third party” shall not be permitted. Such actions are “necessary to protect the fundamental rights and privacies of Floridians and the free flow of commerce within the state.” Concerns such passports would “create two classes of citizens,” and “reduce individual freedom and will harm patient privacy.”

Other states and government representatives are following in a similar spirit.

Pennsylvania House Majority Leader Kerry Benninghoff said:

    “We have constitutional rights and health privacy laws for a reason. They should not cease to exist in a time of crisis. These passports may start with Covid-19, but where will they end? We have concerns about using taxpayer money to generate a system that will now be, possibly, in the hands of mega-tech organizations who’ve already had problems with getting hacked and security issues.”

Several Wisconsin Republican legislators have a bill to prohibit government from requiring a vaccine passport, calling them discriminatory reports WISN 12. The bill banning any restrictions on people based on their vaccine status is still being circulated for co-sponsors but could be introduced in the Legislature later this month.

Ohio State Al Cutrona announced he plans to introduce legislation that would prohibit vaccine passports being mandated by local or state governments. What were the motivations for such legislation?

    “This bill essentially is going to reign in the government and prevent them from overreaching and overstepping like we’ve seen time and time again in the last year.”

Nebraska Gov. Pete Ricketts said Wednesday that the state will not participate in any “vaccine passport program” reports the local Lincoln Star Journal.

    “This concept violates two central tenets of the American system: freedom of movement and health care privacy. Nebraska will take any necessary action to protect the private health information of our citizens and the freedoms we cherish.”

Representative Robert Spendlove sponsored House Bill 308 earlier this year which prohibits a governmental entity — including state agencies, local governments, and public schools — from requiring, either “directly or indirectly,” that an individual receive the COVID-19 vaccine. The bill has since been signed into law by Utah Governor Spencer Cox. In short, Utah is opting out of any “vaccine passport” programs; no such document or database can be utilized as a condition of legal commerce or intrastate travel in the state, writes The Libertas Institute.

Mississippi, an early state along with Texas to allow its citizens to take their masks off, has signaled opposition to the vaccine passport idea. Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves, when asked about the possible use of the passports in Mississippi, stated:

    “I don’t support vaccine passports. I don’t think it’s necessary and I don’t think it’s a good thing to do in America.”

The Arkansas Legislature is currently hearing a bill that would preempt any effort by the governments to require vaccine passports and would bar their use to dictate “entry, travel, education, employment or services.”

Introduced in the House on March 29th, Montana’s HB 702 seeks to bar any discrimination based on vaccination status while prohibiting immunity passports.

In addition, South Carolina Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Reps. Joe Wilson, Ralph Norman, Jeff Duncan, and William R. Timmons, IV recently joined state Gov. Henry McMaster in opposition to vaccine passports.

Georgia Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene went a step further invoking the Book of Revelations:

Congresswoman Greene authored the The We Will Not Comply Act in an effort to ban the implementation of vaccine passports.

The NY Post Editorial Board released a piece titled ‘Vaccine passports’ just aren’t worth the trouble. They state their bottom line as

    “…another one of those technocratic ideas that at best comes too late and would be near-impossible to make work well in this nation, just as contact-tracing has essentially failed.”

Senior Policy Analyst Jay Stanley of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) wrote that

    “We don’t oppose in principle the idea of requiring proof of vaccination in certain contexts…given the enormous difficulty of creating a digital passport system, and the compromises and failures that are likely to happen along the way, we are wary about the side effects and long-term consequences it could have.”

No matter what your thoughts are on the idea of a centralized system to track the vaccinated, a digital identification identifying individuals based on whether or not they will take an experimental product from a pharmaceutical company appears ripe for abuse.

The primary stakeholders in establishing a vaccine passport have a dismal track record when it comes to trustworthiness, fairness, freedoms and the law. Allowing such power to be centralized in the threefold hands of a Big Pharma-Big Tech-Big Government would very likely turn out to be a historically foolish misstep for America and humanity.



Nurse tells why she refused to wear mask, COVID test at airport


Jessica Faraone is the nurse who attracted a firestorm of criticism when she arrived at Pearson and refused to wear a mask, take a COVID test or go to a hotel.

On Sunday, Faraone was invited to tell her side of the story.

Some background: Faraone, 29, has been a nurse for 10 years. She has worked in long-term care (LTC) homes and hospitals and has worked in surgery, plastic surgery, and as a recovery room nurse.

Most recently she worked in a hospital’s acute brain injury and stroke ward.

She wears full personal protective equipment on the job and is not a COVID denier. However, Faraone is against masking children in school and doesn’t see the point of public masking in general.

Before returning home from Tanzania, Faraone had two COVID tests that were negative before she was permitted to board the flight.

“I did not think it was sensible or reasonable to get another invasive test or go to a government-approved hotel instead of my own home,” she said.

In Tanzania, Faraone lived among the general population and with zero COVID health protocols — no masking or distancing required. The issues where she was were malaria, dehydration, typhoid, parasitic infections and wounds; COVID is in the country, but she didn’t see any cases.

She and two other medical volunteers started a GoFundMe campaign to help the hospital where they worked.

What were you expecting on the way home to Pearson?

    I started to get anxiety about having to go back home and living a completely different way (a restricted mask-wearing way) than I was used to, being free in Tanzania. After seeing (prominent GTA anti-lockdown advocate) Chris Sky’s video of not having to do a COVID test, or wear a mask, and him shedding light on the fact that many of these measures go against our rights as Canadians, I started to look more into the Charter of Rights and the guidelines of the Quarantine Act. Chris Sky took a stand for Canada along with many other health-care workers and Canadian doctors; it was time I took a stand for what I actually believed in.

    I’m not saying COVID isn’t real. I’m disputing the measures the government is putting in place for a virus that has a 98% survival rate. The interventions should not be worse than the actual virus itself. I have worked in the hospitals and more than ever I’m seeing suicide, depression, strokes, heart attacks, addiction issues. Masking people and children, oppressing health-care workers’ opinions that go against the grain, socially isolating people, and instilling fear into Canadians … is not how we solve this problem.


Objective: Health – Resistance Against Medical Tyranny

In this episode of Objective: Health we highlight some of the resistance we’ve seen to the medical tyranny that has descended on us under the guise of a deadly pandemic.

Whether in the form of lawsuits, class action suits, standing up to employers mandating vaccination for their employees, or just everyday citizens resisting mask mandates or quarantine measures, it’s heartening to see individuals fighting back, standing their ground and generally resisting the infringement of their rights by an out-of-control authoritarian state.

While governments, corporations or employers may believe they have the right to dictate our right to free movement, forced medical procedures, right to employment or free association, there are citizens who have had enough and are fighting back against the monolithic machine attempting to lock us in our homes to die a slow death.

As Benjamin Franklin said :

“Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

Join us on this episode as we look at some of the inspiring stories of ordinary people fighting back.


51 thoughts on ““Look into My Eyes”, “It’s For Your Safety””

  1. An impressive share! I have just forwarded this onto a coworker who has been conducting a little homework on this. And he actually bought me lunch due to the fact that I discovered it for him… lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanks for spending the time to talk about this matter here on your blog.


  2. Hi, I think your web site may be having browser compatibility problems. When I take a look at your web site in Safari, it looks fine however, when opening in I.E., it has some overlapping issues. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other than that, wonderful blog!


  3. Who in his right mind would want to take holidays in a NAZI CONCENTRATION CAMP LIKE ISRAEL???

    You’d have to be mad…


  4. We will win, we will defeat communists everywhere, from biden to its chinese puppetmasters, to Tibet free at last and independant!


  5. The adverse event numbers coming from the EU are like the EU: unreadable, unpractical, ultra bureaucratic shamble of data thrown with real details and of course totally incomplete.

    Like anything the EU DICTATORSHIP does, the goal is to confuse, mislead and disinform while accuing your ennemies to disinform (a typical marxist technique).

    The EU sucks, their adverse event reports suck too, and a syou mntionned already the head of EMA, Emer Cooke is a big pharma puppet and a corrupt official lying for a living.

    US and UK numbers are easier to obtain although they report only 1% of the deaths and injuries


    1. Yes the EU database from the ema is a soviet style mess and updates are … Well, Europeans pay billions to sustain bureaucrats who work perhaps 4 hours a week for salaries not under 4 to 5k/ month. And this is without counting all the bonuses, advantages and bribes…

      The eu is destroying Europe and Europeans. It should be disbanded and the commissioners sent to jail


  6. Gandhi pointed out three possible responses to oppression and injustice.

    One he described as the coward’s way: to accept the wrong or run away from it.


    The second option was to stand and fight by force of arms. Gandhi said this was better than acceptance or running away.


    But the third way, he said, was best of all and required the most courage to stand and fight solely by non-violent means.



    Liked by 1 person

  7. We are ready to fight and to go to the ultimate struggle for our rights, democracy and to destroy, anihilate, atomize, all the criminals behind the COUP, and all their accomplices.


  8. The illusion of democracy
    The illusion of freedom and rights
    The illusion of a ‘pandemic’
    The illusion of a’crisis’
    The illusion of pre-planned ‘solutions’

    The only thing that’s real is the facist boot permanently set on people’s faces.

    Soon, they will feel it even further, wehn it’s too late.


    1. Exactly, all the cowards and ignorant who submit to coerced ‘vaccination’ think they will be back to ‘normal’, but already in Israel (the 4th reich of israel), the ‘vaccinated’ have to wear a face diaper, must distance from other ‘vaccinated’ cattle and cherry on the cake, will have to update every 6 months to stay under the schackles of their fascist mock of a government.

      They have the same kind of liberty in North Korea, without mandatory jabs!


  9. SWISS JOKE: When was the last time the Swiss had a revolution?

    A bonus point for who finds the answer (needs to be funny)

    The swiss have voted to have a referendum to end the fascist ‘measures’ of their corrupt federal government. Swiss laws allow that.

    However, the vote will take place in June. After the fascist ‘measures’ of their corrupt federal government are planned to end…

    Let me guess, in the mean time they will have injected the peasants with DNA marking tech…. So they can move to next step of the enslavement plan.

    What is the vote good for then?


    1. The Swiss constitution is one of the most democratic on earth. allowing citizen to initiate ‘votations’ by referendum.

      However, the Swiss fedral government is one of the most corrupt in Europe, on top of that all the criminal bankers, the WHO, th UN, the world economic forum and many other of the criminals behind the covid scam have their HQ in Switzerland (co-shared with NY for the UN).

      A beautiful country, with devoted patriots, allowed to bear arms, but surrounded by scum and govern by corrupt criminals.


  10. I find all the tricks and lies used by the establishment in the covid scam gross and not credible.

    I am confident that this kind of scam wouldn’t have worked 20 years ago, even 10 years ago. It shows a clear dumbing down of populations and a worrying addiction to social media and coporate/state media from a large part of this population that has become almost unable of perosnal thinking, free willand common sense.

    The addiction to technology (what they call ‘digital’) is what makes this gross scam believable by masses. As for the old generations, they were already a captive audience by TV (the idiot box)…

    If TV lies, these people believe, so whoever controls TV controls the idiotic masses.


    1. Truly, the addiction to technologic gadgetry (smartphones, social media) and to screens has dumb down people and it’s going to get worse if they don’t get rid of their addcitions.






    A comedian who hosts a news satire program decides to run for president, and a computerized voting machine malfunction gets him elected.

    Man of the Year, 2006 film starring Robin Williams (Tom Dobbs), about a comedian running for president to fight the system corruption, break the status quo, the fake party divide, republican/democrat, end corporate lobbying from big oil, big chemical and big pharma, and restore a government of the people by the people.

    Sounds familiar?

    Sounds like the ‘drain the swamp’ of a certain Donald Trump? After all, Trump, besides being a businessman is also a comedian and a one man show like Robin Williams in the film.

    Of course, two years later, in 2008, criminal Bush was replaced by Obama whose first act of allegiance to his corporate masters was to give a free jail card to the banksters who created the ‘financial crisis’, start new wars in Libya, Syria, and regime change attempts in the Middle east (so-called ‘Arab spring’ where we can already see the hand of Obama’s puppet master Soros).

    In the film, Robin Williams (Tom Dobbs) manages to get elected because the voting system has been replaced by a digital voting system owned by a company called ‘Delacroy’ (the Dominion of the time).

    The problem is that the digital voting system had a glitch and wrongly calculated a victory in favor of Robin Williams.

    An employee of the voting machine’s company, Laura Linney expose the glitch to her CEO and shows that the election results were an error. The CEO and his henchman refuse cover-up the glitch and fire her after having drugged her in her sleep and destroyed her character (sounds familiar).

    She then moves to meet Robin Williams (Tom Dobbs), the president elect to warn him about the glitch and how he has not won the elections in reality.

    As it is a film, of course everything end-up well, Robin Williams finally goes on TV telling Americans that he’s never been elected due to a computer glitch, digital voting machines are removed forever and walks away from the president job. The executives from Delacroy are sent to jail and Robin Williams and the whistleblower live happily ever after.

    That would be nice to see executives from Dominion in jail for fraud…

    The platform used by Robin Williams to get elected is almost the same as Trump, without the border walls, but the goals were the same, ‘break the status quo’, ‘drain the swamp’ , ‘government of the people by the people’.. .


    The only difference is that while in the film, Robin Williams get wrongly elected due to a computer glitch, in the 2020 US presidential elections, joe biden gets elected due to a rigged digital voting system and other fraudulent practices, and instead of changing the status quo and ending corruption, the level of corruption has now reached a point of no return.

    it is also clear that since November 2020, the world knows that the USA are a fake democracy, a banana republic, and a dictatorship in all but name.

    Robin Williams, of course died in 2014, of an alleged ‘suicide’, this is at least what the mainstream media have told us.

    Quotes in the film (it could have been said by trump too):

    ‘I’m fed up with party politics, tired of the whole Republicans versus Democrats thing. Because there’s no real difference; they’re all Mr. Potato-Head candidates.’

    Tom Dobbs: You can’t spend $200 million running for office without owing *something* to *somebody*. Those who can’t afford lobbyists have no advocate. The Statue of Liberty says, “Give me your tired, your poor.” Government says, “Give me your wealthy, your gifted, your endowed.”

    Tom Dobbs: [quoting Benjamin Franklin] Politicians are a lot like diapers. They should be changed frequently, and for the same reason.’

    Tom Dobbs: ‘Why would security guards pad down an 85-year-old lady with a walker? If *she’s* a terrorist… well, then the ball game’s over, folks.’


    ‘If it was *really* unpatriotic to question one’s government, we’d still be British.’

    Why *vote* for Congressmen or Senators? Why don’t we just pick those guys the same way we pick a jury? At least we’ll get a much more interesting cross-section.

    There are roughly 8 thousand slots to be filled, 15 hundred of which will require Senate confirmation. Do we *know* that many incompetent people, outside of Los Angeles?

    The government said recently that we’re cutting back spending, yet NASA blew $28 million to develop a fountain pen that writes upside down in zero gravity. The Russians solved the same problem with a 5-cent pencil… and after two cases of vodka, it’s still writing.

    Politicians today look like they’re borrowed from the wax museum: they’re already in their suits, waiting to be buried. You don’t wanna be like them; you wanna be different.




    1. Thank you Joseph, we know the film, saw it a long time ago but we are going to watch it again, and if you don’t mind we might publish your comment as an article on the website.


  13. Sure, it’s always for our safety… All these corporate assholes helping corrupt politicians to transform our democracies into hell holes dictatorships… Al for our safety of course…

    When are people going to wake up and realize there was no pandemic at all!


  14. The number of leeches playing the fake pandemic game is disgusting, it is at who will lick the more asses and polish boots.

    In my company, you can find the worst specimen of human decadence and outrageous stupidity…


    1. We know some good specimen here too, the kind to send you spam and therefore add traffic to our website. Thank you guys, and by the way, what kind of studies do you need to become a PIG?


  15. “Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

    This is so right, and these people will have none of it.

    They think by obeying their masters and get poisoned they will get back to ‘normal’ and be ‘free’. But when you sell your sould to the devil, you lose your freedom forever.

    Now cry for you belong to the devil for eternity.


    1. yes its’ funny to see the goons jumping in their masks on TV because they have been jabbed an dgiven a piece of paper to prove it.

      So now, the can go shopping… With their face diaper and they can go home, but not more than 10 km around it, not more than 1 h exercize, but hey! They got the jab, they are free!

      And if they behave well, shaking their tails when master tells them, they will be allowed to fly to a tourist hotel (with their mask) in some morons crowded resort where the likes of them go to rest after one year spent at home sitting on their fat asses watching fear porn.

      Real freedom!


  16. This is strange the ceo of pfizer, moderna and astrazeneca look very alike. Same kind of asshole face without any regards for humanity.

    Maybe they are chosen directly by other psychopaths like bill gates.

    Nicely done anyway, nobdy dares to call these assholes for what the really are


    1. Are the ceo of pfizer/moderna/astar genetical clones? It’ possible, maybe they took their own ‘vaccines’ (joking, you’d have to be stupid to do that)


  17. Their plan was clear and exposed since day one of the FALSE FLAG ‘COVID’.

    It was even exposed years before, many alternative news media warned of a false flag pandemic to push the new world order agenda, as early as 2010!

    Now we are here at the crossroads, they have already convinced the not very bright and not very brave (NVB) to accept to be injected by untested DNA altering products. Whatever these NVB tells you, most of them are ignorant and cowards.

    Fear is driving them and when it’s not fear it’s the vilest interests: they fall for the blackmail: liberty against vax id’s… But to have the illusion of liberty, they give away their freedom…

    Don’t try to reason people whose mind is eaten by fear and brain has been slowly melted by months of vile obedience and masking.

    We all know members of our friends and family who are doing exactly that, and we all have tried to wake them up, to open their eyes and conscience, but they remained wide shut.

    You can’t argue with superstitious beliefs, relgious beliefs, specially if they are disguised as ‘science’.

    And also, these people can’t fathom that all the media, 95% of it are lying to them. And 100% of their ‘government’. This is something they won’t believe.

    What can we do? Live by example, one day or another the world knows that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction, that John kennedy murder was a conspiracy, that 9/11 was an inside job and that this ‘pandemic’ never existed in the first place.

    It took few years for some truth to be accepted, it could take decades if not a century for others.


  18. It’s quite amazing that so many people believe their lies juts because they see images on TV.

    even the people who go to empty hospitals still believe that they are are full of dying corpse because they see it on TV.

    It’s like taking an umbrella for the rain because they say it’s raining on TV, while there is not a cloud in the sky.



  19. Sometimes I have the impression to live in Star Wars and the galaxy is under the boot of an evil empire (the globalists), there is very little hope and the populations just comply with what the forces of evil want them to do…

    The fght will be long, but Good will triumph and evil will eventually fall


  20. From the Book: Virus Mania “How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense”

    Published long before the current FALSE ‘epidemic’:

    In his downright fanatical hate of microbes, Pasteur actually came from the ludicrous equation that healthy (tissue) equals a sterile (germ-free) environment.

    He believed in all earnestness that bacteria could not be found in a healthy body.

    Flaws in Pasteur’s theories were shown long ago in the first half of the 20’h century by experiments in which animals were kept completely germ-free.

    Their birth even took place by Cesarean section; after that, they were locked in microbe free cages and given sterile food and water-after a few days, all the animals were dead.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. From the Book: Virus Mania “How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense”

    Published long before the current FALSE ‘epidemic’:

    The number of inconsistencies that arise from the theory of death-bringing viruses is illustrated by the smallpox epidemic, which even today people like to draw upon to stir up epidemic panic.86 But was smallpox really a viral epidemic that was successfully overpowered by vaccines?

    “Medical historians doubt this,” writes journalist Neil Miller in his book Vaccines: Are They Really Safe & Effective? “Not only were there no vaccines for scarlet fever or the Black Plague, and these diseases disappeared all the same.”

    For example, in England, prior to the introduction of mandatory vaccinations in 1953, there were two smallpox deaths per 10,000 inhabitants per year. But at the beginning of the 1870s, nearly 20 years after the introduction of mandatory vaccinations, which had led to a 98% vaccination rate, 88 England suffered 10 smallpox deaths per 10,000 inhabitants annually; five times as many as before. “The smallpox epidemic reached its peak after vaccinations had been introduced,” summarizes William Farr, who was responsible for compiling statistics in London.


    1. This is the same argument they use today to justify their control agenda, the disease they have created in a lab according to all logic is not even as potent as a flu and their untested vaccines don’t even make people immune to it, but it doesn’t matter as perception is their goal. percetion of a thing that doesn’t exist, of a pandemic of mediatic fear and idiocy and overall, the digital id’s they want to force on the human race.

      We found the book and will leave it on the site for download. MAYBE IGNORANT COPS CAN LEARN SOMETHING IF THEY STILL KNOW HOW TO READ…


  22. From the Book: Virus Mania “How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense”

    Published long before the current ‘epidemic’

    “The first step is to give up the illusion that the primary purpose of modern medical research is to improve people’s health most effectively and efficiently,” advises John Abramson of Harvard Medical School. “The primary purpose of commercially-funded clinical research is to maximize financial
    return on investment, not health.”

    Liked by 1 person

  23. agenda 2030 = great reset = fake pandemic = new wordl order = world dictatorship

    Most people are lazy, vile, not smart, cowards and easy to manipulate…

    This is why they get away with their crimes. You’ll have to starve people for them torevolt.

    then if they have been injected with nanoparticles (in the ‘vaccines’), good luck for that!



    “Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way round, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise.”
    Adolf Hitler

    “The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly – it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.”
    Joseph Goebbels

    “Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death.”
    Adolf Hitler


    1. true, it seems they are all copying the nazi playbook for their fake pandemic… dictactwhore merkel has the advantage of playing home with a very large old population subject to amnesia to top it all…

      This is porbably why they started the muzzling and PCR fraud tests there

      Ps: We have a clown that calls itself ‘barbarian’ writing to us in what seems to be a derivative form of English, either he wore a face diaper for too long and his brain has melted or he’s an under age idiot. In any case, keep amusing us with your ‘literature’ boy


  25. “Government control gives rise to fraud, suppression of Truth, intensification of the black market and artificial scarcity. Above all, it unmans the people and deprives them of initiative, it undoes the teaching of self-help.”

    Mahatma Gandhi

    Liked by 1 person

  26. “Fear of disease killed more men than disease itself.”
    Mahatma Gandhi

    “Vaccination is a barbarous practice and one of the most fatal of all the delusions current in our time. Conscientious objectors to vaccination should stand alone, if need be, against the whole world, in defense of their conviction.”
    Mahatma Gandhi


  27. Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth, for being correct, for being you. Never apologize for being correct, or for being years ahead of your time. If you’re right and you know it, speak your mind. Speak your mind. Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is still the truth.
    Mahatma Gandhi


    1. This is exactly what is happening since the beginning of the ‘covid’ FALSE FLAG.
      Ignorant and scared people who take their (dis) information from the totally controlled mainstream media want to censor those who speak the truth.

      – Because the truth is very inconvenient, it proves that these ignorant who think they know a lot, have been fooled like children.
      Pride and arrogance…
      – It also shows that even highly ‘educated’ (trained for conformity in compliance schools) are not smart enough to see they are being manipulated.
      – All the cowards who prefer to be humiliated and to submit rather than fight for their rights (or even refuse to wear a muzzle) would lose their excuses if they admitted the truth.
      – It also anihilate all the social pressure and absurd social conformity to the most absurd deamnds from corrupt governements…
      – Finally the sheep, sheeple and cattle who always follow without asking questions are lost and could lost sleep if they contemplate the truth.

      To admit that you have been deceived and that all your supposed ‘knowledge’ is bogus, is a big step towards salvation and knowlegde.

      And lazy people don’t want to make that effort…

      Liked by 1 person

  28. “I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being perpetrated against a large proportion of the world’s population.”

    He is so right and coming from a former VP at Pfizer, one of the most fined for celonies corporation on earth, it really means something!

    Why don’t we see this man on TV every night instead of the big pharma shills?

    Liked by 1 person

  29. Excellent post (one typo thought) and excellent articles that really shows the covid deception as it is.

    It also shows that most people don’t verify information they read or see, otherwsie they will know that the trial ‘vaccines’ are in phase 3 trial meaning they haven’t been approved but ‘exceptionally authorized’ by ‘regulators’ like the FDA or EMA which are nests of corruption, collusion and conflicts of interests.

    The way the NHS falsify death certificates to inflate and create fake covid deaths is also a fact. Nobody knows about it.

    People are in their majority ignorant but pretend to know, so that they can’t even be open their minds.
    Maybe they are overloaded by information and cant process it…


    1. We are saturated by meaningless information and distraction, if we don’t get away from it. So many say they don’t have time while they waste it on useless information


  30. I’m tired to try to wake-up braindead zombies and to reanimate bums who spent the last year following every stupid rule edicted by the clowns in health&govt…

    When they’ll start to starve, then maybe they will do something, now they are too happy to get the crumbles thrown on the floor by their masters to even be able to do simple maths.


    1. Some people are selling their babies to criminals like moderna to use them as guinea pigs for their mRNA injections. There is no limit to human baseness


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s