This is not news, but it’s been scientifically confirmed by a study made on nearly 10 million people in Wuhan, in China.
The study concludes that so-called “Asymptomatic Cases” are extremely rare if occuring at all, they are testing negative for ‘covid’, they are not sick, they are not infectious and therefore can’t spread the disease and infect others.
So, why do you wear masks then, are told to stay home, are victim of lockdowns, forced to close your business, in the most fascist countries are victim of curfews, and why this hurried ‘vaccination’ scheme?
The study has been published month ago and is available to read here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
and for download, here:
- 9 899 828 PEOPLE SCREENED IN WUHAN PROVINCE IN CHINA
- 300 ‘ASYMPTOMATIC CASES’ OUT OF 9 899 828 PEOPLE (0.00303%)
- ALL ‘ASYMPTOMATIC CASES’ TESTED NEGATIVE FOR SARS-COV-2
- ZERO ‘ASYMPTOMATIC CASES’ FOUND TO BE SICK
- AND NO ‘ASYMPTOMATIC CASE’ WAS CONTAGIOUS
Again, why the lockdowns, the masks, the curfews, the economic, cultural and social destruction, the ‘vaccinations’ blackmail?
Do people still really think that they do that for their health and safety?
“The citywide nucleic acid screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan recruited nearly 10 million people (…) The detection rate of asymptomatic positive cases was very low, and THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF TRANSMISSION FROM ASYMPTOMATIC POSITIVE PERSONS TO TRACED CLOSE CONTACTS.“
“A total of 1174 close contacts of the asymptomatic cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19.“
“ALL CLOSE CONTACTS OF THE ASYMPTOMATIC POSITIVE CASES TESTED NEGATIVE, INDICATING THAT THE ASYMPTOMATIC POSITIVE CASES DETECTED IN THIS STUDY WERE UNLIKELY TO BE INFECTIOUS.”
“IN SUMMARY, the detection rate of asymptomatic positive cases in the post-lockdown Wuhan was very low and THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE IDENTIFIED ASYMPTOMATIC POSITIVE CASES WERE INFECTIOUS.”
Existing laboratory virus culture and genetic studies 9,10 showed that the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 virus may be weakening over time, and the newly infected persons were more likely to be asymptomatic and with a lower viral load than earlier infected cases.
Supplementary information is available for this paper at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19802-w
This study has been widely circulated over the internet in the past few months, except of course by mainstream media who are, as we know, highly subsidized by governments, the pharmaceutical industry, billionaire ‘foundations’ (Gates), and mostly controlled by a handful of corporations pushing for the current ‘covid’ panic agenda since day one.
Here are some articles and analyzes that corroborate what real science has found:
Conclusion of the article:
With solid evidence that asymptomatic spread is nonsense, we have to ask: who is making decisions and why? Again, this brings me back to the metaphor of fog. We are all experiencing confusion and uncertainty over the precise relationship between the strategies and the goals of panoply of regulations and stringencies all around us. Even the rationale has become elusive – even refuted – as frustration and disorientation have displaced what we vaguely recall as clarity and rationality of daily life.
Only 300 asymptomatic cases in the study of nearly 10 million were discovered, and none of those tested positive for COVID-19.
WUHAN, China, December 23, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – A study of almost 10 million people in Wuhan, China, found that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 did not occur at all, thus undermining the need for lockdowns, which are built on the premise of the virus being unwittingly spread by infectious, asymptomatic people.
Published in November in the scientific journal Nature Communications, the paper was compiled by 19 scientists, mainly from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, but also from scientific institutions across China as well as in the U.K. and Australia. It focused on the residents of Wuhan, ground zero for COVID-19, where 9,899,828 people took part in a screening program between May 14 and June 1, which provided clear results as to the possibility of any asymptomatic transmission of the virus.
Asymptomatic transmission has been the underlying justification of lockdowns enforced all across the world. The most recent guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) still states that the virus “can be spread by people who do not have symptoms.” In fact, the CDC claimed that asymptomatic people “are estimated to account for more than 50 percent of transmissions.”
“We keep hearing about how we should follow the science,” Tucker added. “The claim is tired by now. We know what’s really happening.”
He closed his commentary with the question: “With solid evidence that asymptomatic spread is nonsense, we have to ask: Who is making decisions and why?”
There is no scientific data to corroborate the asymptomatic spread of COVID-19. This myth was created and promoted by Technocrat scientists to control populations and drive social engineering outcomes, including the WEF’s Great Reset. ⁃ TN Editor
A new study on asymptomatic transmission of COVID not only proves it doesn’t happen it proves the panic promoted by the political class was meant to control the populations.
In complete contradiction to the popular narrative used by Democrat politicians and governors across the United States, a new study of 10 million people in Wuhan, China – ground zero for the COVID virus, showed that asymptomatic spread of COVID does not occur, nullifying all reasoning for business closures and lockdowns.
In June of 2020, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the World Health Organization’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, stated publicly that she doubted the narrative advanced by the political class on asymptomatic transmission.
That stuck in my brain, and reminded me of the paper published in the Chinese Journal of Epidemiology (2020, Volume 41(4):485-488 (English translation here), lead author Zhuang Guihua, which stated that among asymptomatic carriers, the false positive rate for the RT-PCR test was 80.33%. If you are thinking along the same lines as me, you might see that what I am suspecting is that all of these asymptomatic carriers are nothing more than false positives, and that the test is the disease, which is not something caused by any new, novel and dangerous virus.
I urge you read the Zhuang paper, as it is accessible to ordinary people. The approach is mathematical, and you might think that as a retired CPA I have some insight into that field. Trust me, not so. My fellow CPAs might assert otherwise, but I spent my career doing arithmetic, not mathematics. I was still able to grasp the essentials of the paper, as with the following from page 8 (of 9)):
The types of people targeted for screening has also been widened, which will undoubtedly result in the reporting of more and more “asymptomatic infections”. Based on the information currently available, this study estimates the reasonable range of changes in related indicators and deduces the proportion of false positives in positive screening measures among close contacts of the case. This study found that when the infection rate and reported sensitivity and specificity of close contacts were taken as the most probable values, the positive predictive value was only 19.67%. Conversely, the proportion of false positives in the positive results was 80.33%.
Conclusion of the article:
“Asymptomatic transmission” is a myth brought about by a defective test, nothing more. I urge that anyone reading this under all circumstances avoid both the Covid-19 RT-PCR test and the associated antibody test. The latter is less dangerous but will impart nothing in the way of useful information for as much as $150. The former is dangerous, costing you personal freedom for no valid scientific reason.
Still to come, the vaccination, equally fraudulent. I concur with James Corbett, not linked here, but who said in one of his reports on Bill Gates that when the guy finally dies, someone will have to drive a stake through his heart to make sure he stays dead.
–The quicker the better-
Comment of the day – From “Doctor big pharma”:
It’s true, you can’t transmit a disease you don’t have and you can’t be sick with a disease that don’t make people sick. You also can’t have a disease and have no symptoms.
As for ‘incubation periods’ when someone would be infected but doesn’t know it yet before becoming really sick?
Well I wonder how Homo Sapiens managed all these milleniums without vaccines, masks, stay at home, lockdowns….
If what the corrupt medical establishment, the corrupt politicians, the corrupt media, the corrupt ‘authorities’ were right about what they say, there will be no human being on earth since centuries.
The Black Plague was a real pandemic. What we have here is a scam.